Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. Old Republic General Insurance
122 F. Supp. 3d 44
S.D.N.Y.2015Background
- 170 Broadway hired McGowan as construction manager under a written CMA requiring McGowan to procure general liability insurance naming 170 Broadway and affiliates as additional insureds.
- McGowan had an Old Republic policy effective August 12, 2012; 170 Broadway maintained a separate Wausau policy.
- On October 23, 2012, Adam Burawski (a Tyco employee visiting to bid as a potential subcontractor) was injured on site and later sued the Broadway Defendants; McGowan was later added as a defendant.
- The Broadway Defendants tendered defense to McGowan; Old Republic denied coverage in August 2013 asserting the claim fell outside the additional-insured endorsements and reserved other defenses.
- Wausau sued Old Republic for declaratory judgment (duty to defend and indemnify the Broadway Defendants); Wausau moved for summary judgment; the court granted it.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Old Republic had a duty to defend the Broadway Defendants | The underlying complaint alleges injury arising from McGowan’s ongoing operations and a written contract required additional-insured coverage, so a reasonable possibility of coverage exists | The injury did not arise from McGowan’s “Work” because actual construction had not begun; thus no coverage | Duty to defend exists: complaint and extrinsic facts show injury arose out of McGowan’s ongoing operations and endorsements apply |
| Whether Old Republic had a duty to indemnify (pay liability) | Regal Construction and related precedent require only a causal connection between the injury and the named insured’s operations; indemnification follows if injury arose out of operations | Indemnity requires determination of legal causation or vicarious liability; premature to decide before underlying liability is adjudicated | Duty to indemnify exists: factual nexus suffices under Regal; indemnity can be decided before final liability where policy covers liability “arising out of” operations |
| Whether Old Republic can deny coverage for untimely notice | Notice was timely to trigger coverage or, if late, Old Republic must show actual prejudice under amended N.Y. Ins. Law; Old Republic cannot show prejudice | Old Republic says notice was late and prejudice excuses coverage | Old Republic cannot show material prejudice from any delay it received; under Ins. Law for policies issued after Jan 17, 2009, late notice alone is insufficient to deny coverage |
| Whether Old Republic’s policy is primary or excess to Wausau | Old Republic did not contest Wausau’s showing that Old Republic’s policy is primary | Old Republic did not respond on this point | Court deems Old Republic’s policy primary (plaintiff's uncontested argument treated as conceded) |
Key Cases Cited
- BP Air Conditioning Corp. v. One Beacon Ins. Grp., 8 N.Y.3d 708 (N.Y. 2007) (allegations that named insured performed work at site, breached duty to keep site safe, and caused injury create reasonable possibility of coverage)
- Regal Construction Corp. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 15 N.Y.3d 34 (N.Y. 2010) ("arising out of" requires connection between injury and operation; indemnity may be determined without resolving precise legal causation)
- Worth Constr. Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co., 10 N.Y.3d 411 (N.Y. 2008) (distinguishes cases where injured party’s connection to named insured’s work is absent)
- Servidone Constr. Corp. v. Sec. Ins. Co. of Hartford, 64 N.Y.2d 419 (N.Y. 1985) (duty to indemnify is distinct from duty to defend)
- Fitzpatrick v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 78 N.Y.2d 61 (N.Y. 1991) (insurer may be contractually bound to defend even if ultimately not liable to pay)
- Maroney v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 5 N.Y.3d 467 (N.Y. 2005) (construction of "arising out of" as requiring inquiry into general nature of operation rather than precise cause)
- Euchner-USA Inc. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co., 754 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 2014) (reasonable possibility test governs duty to defend)
