History
  • No items yet
midpage
69 F.4th 983
9th Cir.
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • VHT is a large commercial real-estate photography studio that licenses individual property photos and stores them in a master electronic database; Zillow displayed VHT photos on its Listing Platform and on a design site called Digs.
  • VHT sued Zillow for copyright infringement; the Ninth Circuit in VHT I held Digs’ searchable display was not fair use, vacated a jury finding of willfulness as to 2,700 images, and remanded to decide statutory damages and whether the images constituted a single “compilation” or individual works.
  • After remand, Zillow argued VHT’s suit should be dismissed under 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) because many registrations issued after suit was filed (Fourth Estate); the district court excused exhaustion and proceeded.
  • The district court held the 2,700 contested images were individual works (not a single compilation), conducted a bench trial on damages/innocence, found 388 infringements innocent, and awarded statutory damages ($800 for 2,312 images; $200 for 388).
  • Zillow and VHT cross-appealed; the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court in full: excusal of §411(a) exhaustion, the “individual works” ruling (entitling VHT to per-photo statutory damages), and the damages/innocence determinations and award.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether VHT’s failure to have issued registrations before filing (post-Fourth Estate) required dismissal under §411(a) Excusal appropriate: registration is non-jurisdictional; ownership exists from creation; dismissal now would be irreparable and wasteful Dismissal required under Fourth Estate because registration was not "made" until Copyright Office acted Excusal affirmed: §411(a) treated as non-jurisdictional exhaustion; court applied three-factor test (wholly collateral, irreparable harm, futility) and excused compliance
Whether the 2,700 images are a single "compilation" (one statutory award) or individual works (per-image awards) Photos are separately licensed, have independent economic value, and were infringed individually Photos resided in VHT’s registered database (a compilation), so only one statutory award should apply Images are individual works, not a compilation for §504(c); VHT entitled to statutory damages per infringed photo
Whether district court exceeded mandate by holding a new bench trial on damages/innocence after willfulness vacatur Cross-appeal: district court exceeded mandate and award should reflect prior jury findings New trial was necessary because willfulness vacatur left uncertain the status of many images and appropriate damages New bench trial proper; court correctly reconsidered innocence and awarded damages accordingly
Whether VHT’s database registrations were invalid under §411(b) because they described a compilation Registrations valid as applied to individual photos; compilation holding resolves the concern Registrations inaccurate because database registration implies compilation Court rejected Zillow’s §411(b) challenge as inapplicable given the finding that infringed works were individual photos

Key Cases Cited

  • Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, 139 S. Ct. 881 (2019) (registration is "made" only when the Copyright Office issues a registration after examination)
  • Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154 (2010) (Section 411(a) is non-jurisdictional; registration functions like administrative exhaustion)
  • VHT, Inc. v. Zillow Grp., Inc., 918 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 2019) (earlier Ninth Circuit opinion: Digs searchable use not fair use; vacated willfulness for 2,700 images and remanded on compilation/damages)
  • Alaska Stock, LLC v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publ’g Co., 747 F.3d 673 (9th Cir. 2014) (discusses registration of databases and dual copyrights for database and constituent works)
  • Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003) (copyright protection exists from creation, separate from registration)
  • Unicolors, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P., 142 S. Ct. 941 (2022) (knowledge-based registration inaccuracies can be excused)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Vht, Inc. v. Zillow Group, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 7, 2023
Citations: 69 F.4th 983; 22-35147
Docket Number: 22-35147
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In