History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Woods
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12403
| 8th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Woods pled guilty to Counts I–III of distributing and manufacturing crack cocaine; Count IV was dismissed.
  • PSR attributed Woods at least 172.87 grams of crack cocaine for guideline purposes.
  • Initial advisory range under 2009 guidelines was 135–168 months (level 30, IV).
  • FSA increased crack thresholds (50 g to 280 g) and directed timely conforming guideline amendments; temporary 2010 amendments were issued effective Nov. 1, 2010.
  • At sentencing (Oct. 19, 2010), the court calculated a hypothetical post-FSA range (84–105 months) but actually sentenced Woods to 121 months concurrent on Counts I–III after argument and evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the continuance was abused by court given FSA changes Woods sought delay to benefit from FSA amendments District court had discretion to deny further delay No abuse; discretionary denial upheld
Whether the downward variance based on FSA/crack-powder disparity was abused Misstatements about FSA harmed Woods; variance justified Misstatements did not affect outcome; variance not required Not abused; discretionary denial within wide range of discretion
Whether the district court properly considered § 3553(a) factors Court failed to articulate reasons considering factors Court adequately considered factors and rejected disparity assertion Yes; reasons sufficiently explained the sentence at bottom of advisory range

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Smith, 632 F.3d 1043 (8th Cir. 2011) (savings statute; not retroactive for FSA effects)
  • United States v. Brewer, 624 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 2010) (FSA amendments; not retroactive in penalties calculation)
  • United States v. Payton, 636 F.3d 1027 (8th Cir. 2011) (crack/powder disparity discretion after FSA)
  • United States v. Roberson, 517 F.3d 990 (8th Cir. 2008) (Kimbrough discretion to vary within guidelines use)
  • Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007) (requires meaningful appellate consideration of § 3553(a) factors)
  • Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007) (discretion to vary based on crack/powder disparity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Woods
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 20, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12403
Docket Number: 10-3404
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.