History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Williams
2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132763
S.D.N.Y.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Williams was arrested on October 20, 2009, after a search of Apartment 3C, 1200 College Avenue, Bronx, yielded four firearms and ammunition.
  • The investigation traced a firearms trafficker known as 'Alabama' to Alabama and to a possible NY sale, with misidentifications involving Phillip Scott/Phillip Burroughs.
  • Agent D'Antonio's warrant affidavit contained three inaccuracies and several omissions about sources, timelines, and CI interactions; magistrate issued the search warrant later that day.
  • Williams admitted ownership of the guns during an initial interrogation at the College Avenue apartment, before Miranda warnings were given.
  • At the 44th Precinct, after Miranda rights were read, Williams waived rights and gave statements; the government later sought to admit both rounds of statements.
  • Judge denied a Franks hearing, concluding the inaccuracies/omissions were not material to probable cause; but granted suppression of the post-arrest statements under Capers due to deliberate two-step interrogation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Franks hearing eligibility Williams argues false statements/omissions require Franks relief. Williams contends material inaccuracies compromised probable cause. Denied; no Franks hearing.
Probable cause after corrections Corrected affidavit would still fail probable cause due to key omissions. Corrected affidavit would still show probable cause. Probable cause remains; evidence seized allowed.
Post-arrest statements suppression Miranda warnings at the 44th Precinct cured any taint from unwarned pre-warning statement. Two-step interrogation, Capers framework; taint not cured; statements should be suppressed. Post-arrest statements suppressed.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (probable cause review with deference to magistrate, plus Franks considerations)
  • United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) (Franks framework for false statements/omissions in warrants)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (probable cause standard in warrant affidavits)
  • United States v. Capers, 627 F.3d 470 (2d Cir. 2010) (deliberate two-step interrogation and curative measures under Capers)
  • United States v. Carter, 489 F.3d 528 (2d Cir. 2007) (Elstad/Seibert framework for post-warning statements)
  • Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985) (two-stage interrogation; admissibility of second statement after warning)
  • Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (2004) (two-stage interrogation cautionary framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Williams
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Dec 13, 2010
Citation: 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132763
Docket Number: 09 Cr. 1202(PGG)
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.