United States v. Samuel Gutierrez
876 F.3d 1254
| 9th Cir. | 2017Background
- Samuel Gutierrez confronted a woman in a parking lot, pointed a handgun at her, demanded her keys, and drove off in her car; police later arrested him with the victim’s phone and a loaded gun.
- Federal charges initially included carjacking (18 U.S.C. § 2119), brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence (18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii)), and being a felon in possession of a firearm; Gutierrez pleaded guilty to the § 924(c) count in a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreement and received a stipulated 180-month sentence.
- Gutierrez filed a § 2255 motion arguing his § 924(c) conviction was invalid because carjacking is not a “crime of violence” under § 924(c)(3).
- The district court denied relief, holding carjacking qualifies as a crime of violence; the government did not contest procedural bars on appeal, so the Ninth Circuit reached the merits.
- The statutory definition in § 924(c)(3) contains two clauses: (A) the “force clause” (use/attempted use/threatened use of physical force) and (B) the “residual clause” (substantial risk that force may be used). The court resolved the case under the force clause.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether federal carjacking (18 U.S.C. § 2119) is a “crime of violence” under § 924(c)(3) | Carjacking qualifies because the statute criminalizes taking a vehicle "by force and violence or by intimidation," and intimidation entails threatened violent physical force | Intimidation can be accomplished without the threatened use of violent physical force, so carjacking may fall outside the force clause | Carjacking is a crime of violence under the force clause: "intimidation" requires conduct that would put a reasonable person in fear of bodily harm and thus involves threatened violent physical force |
Key Cases Cited
- Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133 (force clause requires force capable of causing physical pain or injury)
- Moncrieffe v. Holder, 569 U.S. 184 (categorical approach requires examining least-culpable conduct)
- Holloway v. United States, 526 U.S. 1 (§ 2119 intent element: intent to cause serious bodily harm or death at the moment of taking)
- United States v. Evans, 848 F.3d 242 (4th Cir.: carjacking is a crime of violence)
- United States v. Jones, 854 F.3d 737 (5th Cir.: carjacking is a crime of violence)
- United States v. Selfa, 918 F.2d 749 (9th Cir.: bank robbery "intimidation" puts a reasonable person in fear of bodily harm)
- United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405 (bodily injury involves the use of violent force)
