History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Rood
2012 WL 1673924
2d Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Rood pleaded guilty to six federal counts involving child pornography.
  • Indictment alleged a 1991 Ohio conviction for Gross Sexual Imposition as a prior sex offense.
  • District Court sentenced Rood to life imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(e) based on the Ohio conviction.
  • District Court treated the Ohio conviction as a state offense equivalent to a federal offense.
  • On appeal, Rood challenged the use of § 3559(e) and the factual basis for the prior conviction.
  • Court remands for de novo resentencing to reevaluate § 3559(e) applicability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Ohio Gross Sexual Imposition is a federal‑equivalent offense for § 3559(e). Rood argues not equivalent due to mens rea and conduct scope. Government argues Ohio offense is equivalent to federal offense. District Court erred; not conclusively equivalent.
Whether the modified categorical approach applies to the prior conviction. Rood contends analysis requires Shepard approach. Government supports modified categorical approach. Applicable; requires analysis of underlying elements.
Whether the age of the Ohio victim was proven by judicial records. Rood asserts age not conclusively proven by record. Government relies on Municipal Court Statement. Record insufficient; age not necessarily admitted.
Whether sentencing must be remanded for de novo determination of § 3559(e). Rood seeks resentencing without reliance on questionable record. Government opposes new sentencing, but recognizes remand may be needed. Remand for de novo resentencing granted.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Walker, 595 F.3d 441 (2d Cir. 2010) (modified categorical approach applies to state convictions for prior offenses)
  • Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13 (S. Ct. 2005) (limits use of judicial records to 'necessarily admitted' facts)
  • Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (S. Ct. 1990) (basis for using statute text to define prior offense elements)
  • United States v. Green, 480 F.3d 627 (2d Cir. 2007) (remand where sentencing basis is not clearly identifiable as judicial record)
  • United States v. Rosa, 507 F.3d 142 (2d Cir. 2007) (policies restricting use of non-judicial records in § 3559(e) determinations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rood
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: May 15, 2012
Citation: 2012 WL 1673924
Docket Number: 19-650
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.