History
  • No items yet
midpage
489 F. App'x 941
6th Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Ruth was charged with receipt and distribution and possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A; he pled guilty conditionally, preserving appeal of the denial of a motion to suppress.
  • A son reported to Kent, Ohio police that Ruth possessed a computer with child pornography and provided a thumb drive with samples from Ruth’s home; the son claimed abuse by Ruth and suspected others.
  • Police interviewed the son, reviewed the thumb drive images, and prepared a search warrant affidavit based on the interview and evidence; a warrant was executed at Ruth’s home, where Ruth was present and voluntarily spoke with officers.
  • Two computers and multiple digital media were seized; a second warrant allowed search of all digital devices, uncovering further child pornography; Ruth admitted to sexually abusing numerous children.
  • Defendant argued the warrant lacked probable cause due to lack of reliability corroboration for the son and lack of independent corroboration that images came from Ruth’s computer.
  • The district court denied suppression, ruling the affidavit established probable cause and, alternatively, that Leon good-faith exception applies.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Probable cause based on informant and evidence Ruth challenges reliability of son; no prior dealings or corroboration. Actual probable cause exists due to identified location and corroborating physical evidence. Probable cause supported by totality of circumstances.
Reliability/corroboration of informant No independent corroboration; informant unknown and suspect. Son’s identification, demeanor, and physical evidence render reliability high. Informant reliability deemed highly probative; corroboration not necessary to establish probable cause.
Leon good-faith exception applicability If no probable cause, Leon could save the search. None of Leon’s exceptions apply given support for probable cause and non-defective warrant. Leon good-faith exception applies; suppression not warranted.

Key Cases Cited

  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1983) (probable cause under totality of the circumstances)
  • United States v. Leake, 998 F.2d 1359 (6th Cir. 1993) (limits on deference to magistrate’s probable-cause determination)
  • United States v. Townsend, 305 F.3d 537 (6th Cir. 2002) (context for reviewing magistrate decisions; deferential but de novo review)
  • United States v. Frazier, 423 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2005) (use of light most favorable to district court’s decision)
  • United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (U.S. 1984) (good-faith exception to 4th Amendment suppression)
  • United States v. Allen, 211 F.3d 970 (6th Cir. 2000) (great deference to magistrate’s probable cause determination; en banc)
  • Henness v. Bagley, 644 F.3d 308 (6th Cir. 2011) (defendant’s demeanor can inform credibility of informant)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Robert Ruth
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 31, 2012
Citations: 489 F. App'x 941; 11-3937
Docket Number: 11-3937
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Robert Ruth, 489 F. App'x 941