History
  • No items yet
midpage
535 F. App'x 668
10th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Rickett pled guilty to failing to register as a sex offender under SORNA, reserving appeal of district court’s denial of dismissal.
  • He challenges 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) as an unconstitutional delegation allowing retroactive SORNA application to pre‑Act offenders.
  • Pre‑Act offender Rickett had prior state convictions and federal registration duties; the interim/final AG rules later applied SORNA to pre‑Act offenders.
  • He failed to register federally after release and was indicted in 2010 for SORNA registration violations.
  • District court denied dismissal; Rickett was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment and five years of supervised release; government waived its appellate rights under the plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the nondelegation challenge survives the guilty plea Rickett (Rickett) argues § 16913(d) unconstitutional. Rickett contends the challenge is valid despite the plea. Not resolved on jurisdiction; government waiver preserved for merits review.
Whether § 16913(d) constitutes an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power Rickett contends AG’s retroactive applicability lacks intelligible principle. Rickett argues delegation violates nondelegation doctrine. Not plain error; § 16913(d) upheld against plain‑error review.
Whether plain‑error review applies to the nondelegation claim and whether it is plain Claim should be reviewed de novo as a facial challenge. Nondelegation issue not plain under current law. Nondelegation claim not plain; circuit authority supports upholding § 16913(d).

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. De Vaughn, 694 F.3d 1141 (10th Cir. 2012) (unconditional guilty plea does not deprive appellate court of jurisdiction; government may waive effects)
  • United States v. Salazar, 323 F.3d 852 (10th Cir. 2003) (non-jurisdictional defenses may be waived by guilty plea)
  • Blackledge v. Perry, 417 U.S. 21 (U.S. 1974) (due process/double jeopardy related to plea effects (Blackledge/Menna))
  • Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1975) (adjunct to Blackledge; governs post-plea challenges)
  • Reynolds v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 975 (Supreme Court 2012) (pre‑Act offenders and AG discretion to apply retroactively)
  • United States v. Kuehl, 706 F.3d 917 (8th Cir. 2013) (upholds § 16913(d) delegation against nondelegation challenge)
  • United States v. Parks, 698 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2012) (rejects nondelegation challenge to SORNA)
  • United States v. Felts, 674 F.3d 599 (6th Cir. 2012) (rejects nondelegation challenge to SORNA)
  • United States v. Guzman, 591 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2010) (rejects nondelegation challenge to SORNA)
  • United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2009) (rejects nondelegation challenge to SORNA)
  • United States v. Ambert, 561 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir. 2009) (rejects nondelegation challenge to SORNA)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Rickett
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 5, 2013
Citations: 535 F. App'x 668; 11-2165
Docket Number: 11-2165
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Rickett, 535 F. App'x 668