History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Reed
636 F.3d 966
8th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Reed was convicted of possessing a firearm and ammunition while a fugitive from justice under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(2), 924(a)(2).
  • He left Nevada with an outstanding warrant and returned to North Dakota, where a firearm and ammunition were later found in a safe at the Little Shell Nation HQ that Reed used.
  • Federal investigators linked Reed to the safe and the firearm; a Desert Eagle nine millimeter gun and ammo were recovered, along with Reed's personal items.
  • Reed had made threatening statements while in custody, including references to a firearm and violence against authorities; a safe at his office was identified as belonging to him.
  • The government lacked direct proof of actual possession but pursued constructive possession, arguing Reed exercised dominion/control over the firearm or the premises.
  • The district court instructed the jury that a fugitive need not leave with the intent to avoid charges to be considered a fugitive; Reed objected only to a separate definitional modification.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for constructive possession Reed Reed Evidence supports constructive possession
Plain error from fugitive instruction Reed Reed No plain error; instruction not clearly erroneous

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Anderson, 618 F.3d 873 (8th Cir. 2010) (ownership/control over firearm or premises required for possession)
  • United States v. Ali, 63 F.3d 710 (8th Cir. 1995) (recognizes model jury instruction on possession via dominion)
  • United States v. Ballentine, 4 F.3d 504 (7th Cir. 1993) (intention timing of leaving not required to be fugitive)
  • United States v. Spillane, 913 F.2d 1079 (4th Cir. 1990) (no requirement that leave to avoid prosecution)
  • United States v. Gianakos, 415 F.3d 912 (8th Cir. 2005) (plain error standard for modified instructions)
  • United States v. Pazour, 609 F.3d 950 (8th Cir. 2010) (circuit split; not clear under current law)
  • United States v. Garcia, 521 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review for sufficiency of evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Reed
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 8, 2011
Citation: 636 F.3d 966
Docket Number: 10-2010
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.