History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. McGregor
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10883
| 1st Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • McGregor was indicted for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition.
  • He moved to suppress evidence from a warrantless car search; the district court denied.
  • McGregor pled guilty conditionally, preserving appellate review of the suppression ruling.
  • Officers observed a late-night shooting linked to Magnolia Street Gang and followed a suspect Honda.
  • The Honda occupants, including McGregor, fled from the hospital scene after the shooting.
  • A protective search was conducted under Long after perceiving potential danger to officers, leading to discovery of a firearm and cocaine in a center-console hide.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there reasonable suspicion to justify a limited protective search? McGregor argues lack of reasonable suspicion. McGregor contends no objective basis for fear of weapons. Yes; the totality supported reasonable suspicion of weapons.
Was the prolonged protective search within Long’s scope? McGregor argues excessive intrusion. McGregor’s actions were within Long’s protective-search scope. Yes; the actions were permissible under Long given danger concerns.
Did the officers’ use of traffic violations as a basis render the search pretextual? McGregor claims the stop was pretextual. Officers had probable cause from traffic violations; motive irrelevant per Whren. No; stop supported by probable cause, motive immaterial under Whren.
Did the post-stop discoveries provide probable cause to access the console hide? McGregor contends lack of basis to open the panel. Findings justified opening the console under Long after initial suspicions. Yes; later findings reasonably supported deployment of the panel access.

Key Cases Cited

  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (U.S. 1996) (subjective motives irrelevant to stop legality)
  • Long v. United States, 463 U.S. 1032 (U.S. 1983) (limited protective search for weapons in auto must be narrowly tailored)
  • Lott v. United States, 870 F.2d 778 (1st Cir. 1989) (requires objectively reasonable basis for fear for safety)
  • Arvizu v. United States, 534 U.S. 266 (U.S. 2002) (totality-of-the-circumstances approach to reasonable suspicion)
  • United States v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1981) (search incident to arrest limits scope to passenger compartment)
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (U.S. 2009) (limits on searches incident to arrest; preserves Belton/Long framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. McGregor
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: May 27, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10883
Docket Number: 09-2650
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.