History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. McBride
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4969
7th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Gasvoda stopped McBride for a missing rear license plate, speeding, and lane changes without signaling.
  • Approximately 25 minutes elapsed before McBride consented to a vehicle search.
  • McBride exited the car, there was a pat-down search, and his nervous demeanor persisted.
  • Investigatory questions about travel plans and baggage followed, with no immediate result but ongoing information gathering.
  • A canine sniff was conducted and yielded a negative result; McBride was ultimately allowed to retrieve his coat and the officer continued routine duties.
  • McBride consented to a later search which yielded crack cocaine, marijuana, and a loaded handgun; district court denied suppression, and McBride pled guilty reserving suppression appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did detention extend beyond the stop’s purpose? McBride contends consent was tainted by extended detention. Gasvoda’s additional questions were permissible, constituting a grace period after the stop. No Fourth Amendment violation; stop reasonable and extended questions were permissible.

Key Cases Cited

  • Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (U.S. 2005) (traffic-stop reasonableness framework; no need for expeditious release when stop based on probable cause)
  • United States v. Taylor, 596 F.3d 373 (7th Cir. 2010) (basis of stop (probable cause) differs from Terry-based limits)
  • United States v. Childs, 277 F.3d 947 (7th Cir. 2002) (probable-cause stops not bound by Terry duration; permissible grace period for investigatory questions)
  • Estrada v. Rhode Island, 594 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2010) (investigative information may justify extending a stop)
  • United States v. Figueroa-Espana, 511 F.3d 696 (7th Cir. 2007) (information gathered may provide reasonable suspicion to extend a stop)
  • United States v. Garcia, 376 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2004) (nervous demeanor and inconsistent statements can contribute to reasonable suspicion)
  • United States v. Moore, 375 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 2004) (routine inquiries may be permissible and not prolong the stop unreasonably)
  • Ray v. City of Chicago, 629 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 2011) (form of detention and investigatory questioning during a stop analyzed for reasonableness)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. McBride
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Mar 14, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4969
Docket Number: 10-2094
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.