History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Marquez Lawhorn
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22873
| 8th Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Lawhorn pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2).
  • Police responded to a 911 call about a robbery threat; a red Ford Bronco with a single occupant matched the description.
  • Officers shined a spotlight, observed Lawhorn look back with wide eyes, and he reached quickly into the back seat; handgun found behind passenger seat.
  • Stabenow represented Lawhorn and did not discuss suppression; Lawhorn expressed satisfaction with counsel at the plea hearing.
  • Stabenow withdrew; new counsel suggested suppression should have been pursued; Lawhorn moved to withdraw his guilty plea alleging ineffective assistance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether ineffective assistance of counsel to pursue suppression is a fair and just reason to withdraw a guilty plea Lawhorn Lawhorn No fair and just reason; suppression would have failed
Whether officers had reasonable suspicion to detain Lawhorn Lawhorn Lawhorn Yes; totality of circumstances supported a Terry stop

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Murphy, 572 F.3d 563 (8th Cir. 2009) (fair and just standard for withdrawal of guilty plea and ineffective-assistance analysis)
  • Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985) (prejudice inquiry in guilty-plea withdrawal follows Strickland framework)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (ineffective assistance standard)
  • Cruz v. United States, 643 F.3d 639 (8th Cir. 2011) (defendant must show deficient performance under Strickland)
  • United States v. Bynum, 508 F.3d 1134 (8th Cir. 2007) (lawful vantage to seize in plain view; no need for further suspicion)
  • United States v. Hughes, 517 F.3d 1013 (8th Cir. 2008) (reasonable suspicion determined by totality of circumstances)
  • Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002) (totality of the circumstances framework for reasonable suspicion)
  • United States v. McBride, 801 F.2d 1045 (8th Cir. 1986) (informant reliability and corroboration in reasonable-suspicion analysis)
  • Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993) (plain-view seizure and seizure standards)
  • United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740 (6th Cir. 2008) (informant tip and corroboration considerations in reasonable suspicion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Marquez Lawhorn
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 13, 2013
Citation: 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22873
Docket Number: 12-3464
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.