History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Juan Oleo
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20235
| 6th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • De Oleo and co-conspirators ran sham Medicare clinics, bribing beneficiaries to submit insurance and bill Medicare for expensive meds.
  • They moved fraud from Florida to Michigan, forming Xpress Medical Center with Rosario.
  • Indictment followed; many co-defendants pled guilty; De Oleo and Genao were tried; Teagan was largely acquitted.
  • Juror 12 was excused after trial due to school obligations; district court found reasonable cause.
  • Evidence of other fraudulent clinics was admitted under Rule 404(b) to show De Oleo’s intent/knowledge, with a limiting instruction.
  • Conviction and sentence were affirmed as the other-acts evidence was admissible and harmless beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Juror replacement after evidence ended was proper? De Oleo claims the replacement prejudiced him. District court had reasonable cause to excuse juror 12. Yes; no abuse of discretion, no prejudice.
Admission of other-acts evidence under Rule 404(b)? Evidence of Florida/Michigan clinics was irrelevant to De Oleo’s acts. Evidence showed knowledge, intent, and plan; properly admitted. Admissible; 403 balancing and limiting instruction preserved fairness.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Cantu, 229 F.3d 544 (6th Cir. 2000) (juror replacement for good cause; abuse of discretion review)
  • United States v. Warren, 973 F.2d 1304 (6th Cir. 1992) (balance juror replacement against jury integrity)
  • United States v. Brown, 571 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978) (considerations of vagaries in juror circumstances)
  • United States v. Shelton, 669 F.2d 446 (7th Cir. 1982) (individual juror circumstances may justify excuse)
  • United States v. Virgen-Moreno, 265 F.3d 276 (5th Cir. 2001) (family tragedies can impair juror duty)
  • United States v. Marrero, 651 F.3d 453 (6th Cir. 2011) (background evidence may be integral to testimony)
  • United States v. Lamar, 466 F. App’x 495 (6th Cir. 2012) (background/related acts as context for 404(b))
  • United States v. Kotteakos, 328 U.S. 750 (1946) (harmless-error considerations in evaluating evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Juan Oleo
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 20, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20235
Docket Number: 11-1360
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.