History
  • No items yet
midpage
817 F.3d 1099
8th Cir.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Spight challenges a conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
  • Bench trial with Wasson, Price, and Davis as witnesses; video from nightclub surveillance admitted.
  • ATF Special Agent Siebenaler testified expert on interstate-commerce element.
  • Gun discharged during struggle; Wasson wrestled gun and handed it to Price.
  • Video corroborated witnesses and supported possession despite credibility concerns from criminal histories.
  • District court concluded gun traveled in interstate commerce; Spight sentenced to 212 months.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence to convict Spight questions witness credibility Conviction rests on video corroboration and credible testimony Evidence sufficient beyond reasonable doubt
Admissibility of expert testimony on interstate commerce Expert lacked proper foundation Testimony based on proper bases (trace, manufacture, location) Admissible; district court did not abuse discretion
Ineffective-assistance claim Counsel ineffective under Strickland Not properly raised on direct appeal Declined to consider on direct appeal
Brady claim Suppression of exculpatory evidence No exculpatory evidence withheld; claim unpreserved No plain-error Brady violation

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Johnson, 745 F.3d 866 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard for sufficiency review; credibility not reevaluated on appeal)
  • United States v. Ojeda-Estrada, 577 F.3d 871 (8th Cir. 2009) (credibility determinations reviewed with deference to trier of fact)
  • United States v. Goodale, 738 F.3d 917 (8th Cir. 2013) (credibility determinations and video corroboration considered by court of appeals)
  • United States v. Holmes, 751 F.3d 846 (8th Cir. 2014) (abuse-of-discretion review of admissibility of expert testimony)
  • United States v. Maddix, 96 F.3d 311 (8th Cir. 1996) (basis for expert testimony on interstate-commerce element)
  • United States v. Cox, 942 F.2d 1282 (8th Cir. 1991) (non-licensed manufacturer evidence supports interstate-commerce finding)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Jamillo Donte Spight
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 4, 2016
Citations: 817 F.3d 1099; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 6114; 2016 WL 1295139; 15-1116
Docket Number: 15-1116
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Jamillo Donte Spight, 817 F.3d 1099