History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Erik Jenkins
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5702
| 5th Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Jenkins pleaded guilty to multiple counts involving the receipt, distribution, and possession of child pornography and related obscene material.
  • PSR found 36 image files and 110 video files depicting prepubescent children; majority ages 7–10, some infants/toddlers.
  • PSR recommended a 2-level §2G2.2(b)(2) enhancement for prepubescent victims and a 4-level §2G2.2(b)(4) enhancement for depictions of violence; also recommended 2-level §3A1.1(b)(1) and other enhancements.
  • District court adopted the PSR’s recommendations, applying the §3A1.1(b)(1) vulnerable-victim enhancement, and computed a total offense level of 36, with criminal history IV; guidelines range exceeded statutory maximum, so 20-year ceiling applied.
  • Jenkins received 240 months imprisonment after the district court denied both below-Guidelines and above-Guidelines motions; he appealed challenging the §3A1.1(b)(1) enhancement and substantive reasonableness.
  • The court affirmed, holding the §3A1.1(b)(1) enhancement appropriate and the sentence substantively reasonable.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §3A1.1(b)(1) applies with §2G2.2(b)(2) when victims are vulnerable by age. Jenkins argues vulnerability is already captured by age-based §2G2.2(b)(2). Jenkins contends the enhancement is improper given age-related vulnerability is incorporated in the offense guideline. Affirmed; §3A1.1(b)(1) can apply alongside §2G2.2(b)(2).
Whether the within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. Jenkins claims lack of empirical basis and mitigation warrant lower sentence. Government argues district court properly weighed factors; no abuse of discretion. Affirmed; sentence within range is presumptively reasonable.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Wright, 373 F.3d 935 (9th Cir. 2004) (vulnerable-victim enhancement alongside prepubescent victim guideline)
  • United States v. Norris, 159 F.3d 926 (5th Cir. 1998) (victimization may extend beyond production; consumers are victims too)
  • United States v. Lynn, 636 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2011) (endorses application of vulnerable-victim where not fully captured by other enhancements)
  • Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993) (guidelines commentary authoritative unless unconstitutional or inconsistent)
  • Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007) (reasonable-review standard for sentences within guidelines)
  • United States v. Miller, 665 F.3d 114 (5th Cir. 2011) (empirical-basis challenge foreclosed in circuit)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Erik Jenkins
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 20, 2013
Citation: 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5702
Docket Number: 11-51277
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.