History
  • No items yet
midpage
829 F. Supp. 2d 1342
N.D. Ga.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Cordova moved to suppress statements from March 26, 30, and 31, 2009, arguing they were fruits of an illegal March 26 warrantless search.
  • Judge Duffey previously suppressed the March 26 search findings and held the 26/27 searches tainted subsequent interrogations.
  • Gwinnett County officers conducted a warrantless search of Cordova’s residence on March 26, 2009, yielding items linked to robberies and prompting in-custody questioning without Miranda warnings.
  • Defendant was questioned on March 26 without Miranda rights; he was not arrested then, but later questioned on March 30 after being advised of rights and then arrested, with a March 31 interview following.
  • Magistrate Judge Hagy recommended suppression of March 26, 30, and 31 statements as fruits of the illegal search, noting interrogation leveraged tainted evidence.
  • The district court adopted the R&R, granting suppression of the challenged statements.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are March 31, 2009 statements fruit of the poisonous tree? Cordova Cordova Yes; statements are tainted and suppressed
Does Brown framework apply to post-search statements and break the taint? Cordova Cordova Non-exclusive factors apply; taint persists; suppression warranted
Are the March 31 statements admissible under Miranda and voluntary-waiver standards Cordova Cordova Waiver voluntary and Miranda warning later does not cure taint; however the court finds taint persists regardless

Key Cases Cited

  • Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (U.S. 1985) (non-auto exclusion of post-Miranda statements after valid waiver)
  • Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 (U.S. 2004) (question-first technique requires curative steps for post-warning confessions)
  • Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (U.S. 1975) (taint analysis for confessions after illegal arrest)
  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (U.S. 2000) (Miranda rule as a constitutional rule)
  • United States v. Lall, 607 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2010) (promises of immunity can affect voluntariness of waiver)
  • United States v. Davis, 332 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2003) (causal link between illegal search and statements)
  • United States v. Street, 472 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2006) (Seibert curative steps and timing requirements)
  • Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 (U.S. 1982) (exclusionary rule distinct between Fourth and Fifth Amendments)
  • Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1986) (two-dimension Miranda waiver standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Cordova
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Georgia
Date Published: Nov 3, 2011
Citations: 829 F. Supp. 2d 1342; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127026; 2011 WL 5325522; No. 1:09-CR-475-WSD-CCH-5
Docket Number: No. 1:09-CR-475-WSD-CCH-5
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ga.
Log In
    United States v. Cordova, 829 F. Supp. 2d 1342