United States v. Clifton Campbell
677 F. App'x 838
| 4th Cir. | 2017Background
- Clifton Deron Campbell was charged under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) for possession of a firearm and ammunition as a convicted felon.
- Police arrested Campbell just outside a residence pursuant to an arrest warrant.
- Officers found marijuana, empty baggies, and digital scales on Campbell, and included those facts in a search-warrant affidavit.
- The affidavit did not strongly tie Campbell to the residence; officers, however, had additional undisclosed facts suggesting he lived there (surveillance, his car regularly parked there, his girlfriend rented the home).
- The district court denied Campbell’s motion to suppress, concluding that even if the affidavit lacked probable cause, the Leon good-faith exception applied. Campbell pleaded guilty and appealed the denial of the suppression motion.
- The Fourth Circuit affirmed, holding the good-faith exception justified denial of suppression given all circumstances and undisclosed but known facts to officers.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the affidavit established probable cause tying Campbell to the residence | Affidavit failed to adequately connect Campbell to the home; thus the search warrant lacked probable cause | Officers had observations and evidence (drugs on Campbell) supporting a search, and officers also had undisclosed surveillance-based facts linking Campbell to the residence | Court did not decide probable cause; proceeded to good-faith analysis and upheld the search under the good-faith exception |
| Whether the good-faith exception applies despite a possibly deficient affidavit | Good-faith exception inapplicable because affidavit so lacking in indicia of probable cause that belief in its existence was unreasonable | Good-faith exception applies because a reasonably well-trained officer, considering both affidavit contents and unpresented facts known to officers, would have believed the search lawful | Good-faith exception applies; suppression not required |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Andrews, 577 F.3d 231 (4th Cir.) (general rule that evidence from a Fourth Amendment violation is inadmissible)
- United States v. Lalor, 996 F.2d 1578 (4th Cir.) (good-faith exception applied unless officers were dishonest, reckless, or lacked objectively reasonable belief in probable cause)
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (Sup. Ct.) (warrant issued by magistrate ordinarily establishes officer good faith)
- United States v. Hyppolite, 65 F.3d 1151 (4th Cir.) (good-faith exception inapplicable if affidavit so lacking in indicia of probable cause that belief was entirely unreasonable)
- United States v. McKenzie-Gude, 671 F.3d 452 (4th Cir.) (courts may consider uncontroverted facts known to officers but not disclosed to magistrate in good-faith analysis)
- United States v. Williams, 740 F.3d 308 (4th Cir.) (standard of review: factual findings for clear error, legal conclusions de novo)
- United States v. Grossman, 400 F.3d 212 (4th Cir.) (when suppression denied, view evidence in light most favorable to Government)
- United States v. Legg, 18 F.3d 240 (4th Cir.) (court may proceed directly to good-faith analysis without resolving probable cause)
