United States v. Christopher Washington
19-4501
| 4th Cir. | Dec 16, 2021Background
- Christopher Tyshawn Washington pleaded guilty (Feb 2019) to possession with intent to distribute marijuana (21 U.S.C. § 841) and being a felon in possession of a firearm (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)).
- The district court sentenced him to concurrent 120-month terms; he appealed.
- While his appeal was pending, the Supreme Court decided Rehaif v. United States, holding the government must prove the defendant knew both that he possessed a firearm and that he had the relevant status (e.g., was a felon).
- Washington argued on appeal that the indictment and Rule 11 colloquy omitted the Rehaif knowledge-of-status element, rendering his conviction invalid and his plea not knowing and voluntary.
- The government had filed a § 851 Information of Prior Conviction, and at the Rule 11 hearing Washington acknowledged awareness of that prior felony.
- The Fourth Circuit reviewed Washington’s claims for plain error and affirmed the conviction and sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the indictment was invalid for omitting Rehaif's knowledge-of-status element | Indictment omitted an essential element required by Rehaif, so conviction invalid | Government filed §851 information and Washington acknowledged prior felony; guilty plea waives sufficiency challenge | No plain error; indictment valid for purposes of plea and waived by guilty plea |
| Whether the plea was not knowing/voluntary because Rule 11 and factual basis omitted the knowledge element | District court failed to advise of the knowledge element and accepted insufficient factual basis, so plea involuntary | Washington acknowledged his prior conviction; he made no representation he would have introduced evidence he didn’t know he was a felon (as required by Greer) | No plain error; plea was knowing/voluntary and prior convictions supplied substantial evidence he knew he was a felon |
Key Cases Cited
- Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019) (knowledge-of-status is an element of a §922(g) offense)
- Greer v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 2090 (2021) (plain-error framework for Rehaif claims in felon-in-possession cases)
- United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002) (indictment defects do not deprive a court of jurisdiction)
- United States v. Quinn, 359 F.3d 666 (4th Cir. 2004) (plain-error review where claim not raised below)
- United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184 (4th Cir. 1990) (presumption in support of indictment sufficiency post-verdict)
- United States v. Moussaoui, 591 F.3d 263 (4th Cir. 2010) (guilty plea waives challenges to indictment)
