United States v. Anthony Collins
883 F.3d 1029
8th Cir.2018Background
- Early-morning surveillance of 9028 Oak Street in Kansas City found the garage associated with Robert Currie had been the site of prior controlled buys of methamphetamine and heavy late-night/early-morning transient traffic consistent with drug activity.
- Officers observed Collins enter the garage at about 3:30–4:30 a.m., remain roughly 10–15 minutes, then leave driving a Mercury Grand Marquis.
- Officers followed, activated lights after the vehicle left sight of the garage, and stopped the car after it made multiple turns and brake taps; both occupants were ordered out and detained.
- An officer saw a magazine with live ammo in plain view on the driver’s seat, did a protective sweep, and recovered a loaded firearm from the glove box; a records check revealed Collins was a convicted felon.
- Collins was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm and moved to suppress evidence obtained from the warrantless stop and vehicle search; the district court denied the motion, Collins entered a conditional guilty plea, and appealed refusal to suppress.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officers had reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop Collins's vehicle | Collins: surveillance did not show pervasive illegal activity making any visitor suspect; officers lacked evidence specifically linking Collins to drug activity; no observed sales by Officer Murphy; time alone is not indicative of trafficking | Government: totality of circumstances (prior controlled buys, informants, surveillance showing heavy late-night brief visits, Collins's entry and short stay in the known drug location) gave reasonable suspicion to investigate | Stop was supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion under the totality of circumstances; stop was lawful |
| Whether stop depended on alleged failure to yield to patrol car | Collins: officers lacked reasonable suspicion because he did not fail to yield when lights were activated | Government: independent reasonable suspicion existed before any failure-to-yield issue | Court did not reach the failure-to-yield argument because reasonable suspicion existed prior to the stop |
Key Cases Cited
- Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) (brief investigatory stops permitted on reasonable, articulable suspicion)
- United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266 (2002) (totality-of-the-circumstances test; officers may draw on training and experience)
- United States v. Winters, 491 F.3d 918 (8th Cir. 2007) (brief stops of vehicles permissible to investigate suspected criminal activity)
- United States v. Robinson, 670 F.3d 874 (8th Cir. 2012) (totality analysis and deference to officers' inferences)
- United States v. Bustos-Torres, 396 F.3d 935 (8th Cir. 2005) (reasonable suspicion may exist absent knowledge of a suspect's prior criminal history)
- United States v. Buchannon, 878 F.2d 1065 (8th Cir. 1989) (presence at a location under investigation can support reasonable suspicion)
- United States v. Spotts, 275 F.3d 714 (8th Cir. 2002) (factors supporting belief vehicle contained drugs or evidence of drug activity)
