History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tyson v. United States
2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 620
| D.C. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Tyson was convicted of misdemeanor assault on a police officer (APO) after a bench trial; other charged offenses (unlawful entry, disorderly conduct) were dismissed/acquitted.
  • The incident occurred at the Gallery Place Metro station on January 16, 2010, after 8:00 p.m., involving Metro Transit Police Officers Holloway and Kent.
  • Holloway observed Tyson loitering and warned him to leave; Tyson returned and became combative when officers sought to arrest him.
  • The officers forcibly detained Tyson; he resisted, and the officers used force (hands/knees/baton) during the arrest.
  • The defense presented witnesses who claimed Tyson did not resist and that officers knocked him down without warning; Tyson contends there was excessive force by officers.
  • The trial court, a bench trial, credited the officers over Tyson and found that Tyson resisted the arrest; Tyson challenged whether the court should have made a specific finding on justifiable or excusable cause to resist.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by not making a specific finding on justifiable or excusable cause. Tyson preservation theory: counsel framed officers’ actions as violent and requested findings. Trial court failed to make required special findings; defense preserved by request. No error; findings not required absent timely request; defense not preserved; plain error not shown.

Key Cases Cited

  • Nelson v. United States, 580 A.2d 114 (D.C.1990) (generally self-defense not a defense to assault on a police officer; exceptions apply)
  • Bond v. United States, 233 A.2d 506 (D.C.1967) (failure to request special findings ordinarily waives right to them; remand exceptions limited)
  • Jones v. United States, 16 A.3d 966 (D.C.2011) (remand for theory on which conviction relied only under Jones conditions)
  • Markowitz v. United States, 598 A.2d 398 (D.C.1991) (no obligation to make special findings absent timely request; credibility determinations discussed)
  • United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (U.S.1993) (plain error standard elements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tyson v. United States
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 3, 2011
Citation: 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 620
Docket Number: 10-CM-483
Court Abbreviation: D.C.