midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
963 F. Supp. 2d 427
E.D. Pa.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Tyler W. (born 2001) and family sue Upper Perkiomen School District for denial of FAPE under IDEA, §504, and ADA.
  • Plaintiffs allege inadequate evaluation, defective IEPs, lack of related services, and improper placement at Wordsworth Academy (APS).
  • Tyler underwent early intervention, preschool, and multiple evaluations; diagnosed with behavioral and developmental disorders, including Asperger’s syndrome and ODD.
  • District placed Tyler in Wordsworth (APS) for ESY and later in other settings; Tyler attended a PHP at Creative Health during kindergarten.
  • Administrative decisions: Hearing Officer granted some compensatory education for lack of OT/PT; Appeals Panel increased ESY-related hours; district argued progress and LRE supported Wordsworth.
  • Court reviews de novo with deference to administrative findings; total compensatory education award ultimately set at 439.5 hours with a partial reversal of the PHP-period award.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Evaluation and IEP adequacy Tyler’s evaluation/IEP were inadequate and misidentified needs. Evaluation identified needs and placed Tyler in appropriate program; IEPs were reasonable. No reversal of outcome; evaluations/IEPs upheld as adequate.
LRE compliance Wordsworth was not the proper LRE for Tyler. Behavioral issues justify restrictive placement; LRE satisfied under Oberti framework. District complied with LRE; placement affirmed.
Excessive transportation time Long bus rides denied Tyler a FAPE. No firm cap on travel time; no demonstrated education denial from ride length. Transportation time not shown to deny FAPE; upheld.
ESY and related services during ESY ESY lacked appropriate related services (OT/PT/SLT). Appeals Panel awarded compensatory hours for ESY deficiencies; otherwise ESY proper. Affirmed compensatory education for ESY-related service gaps; no change to ESY framework.
Compensatory education for PHP period Full days of compensatory education due for period Tyler was in Creative Health (Aug–Dec 2006). Limited compensation for related services during PHP. Granted full days of compensatory education for Aug–Dec 2006 period; total 439.5 hours.

Key Cases Cited

  • S.H. v. State-Operated Sch. Dist. of Newark, 336 F.3d 260 (3d Cir. 2003) (framework for deference in modified de novo review)
  • Shore Reg’l High Sch. Bd. of Educ. v. P.S., 381 F.3d 194 (3d Cir. 2004) (prima facie correctness of administrative findings; FAPE/LRE considerations)
  • Carlisle Area Sch. v. Scott P. ex rel. Bess P., 62 F.3d 520 (3d Cir. 1995) (deference to hearing officer; credibility judgments)
  • Oberti by Oberti v. Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Clementon Sch. Dist., 995 F.2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993) (two-prong test for LRE/mainstreaming)
  • Ridgewood Bd. of Educ. v. N.E. ex rel. M.E., 172 F.3d 238 (3d Cir. 1999) (comprehensive framework for compensatory education after FAPE violation)
  • P.P. ex rel. Michael P. v. W. Chester Area Sch. Dist., 585 F.3d 727 (3d Cir. 2009) (interpretation of appropriate IEP and related remedies)
  • D.K. v. Abington Sch. Dist., 696 F.3d 233 (3d Cir. 2012) (reasonable standard for determining FAPE compliance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tyler W. ex rel. Daniel W. v. Upper Perkiomen School District
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Aug 6, 2013
Citations: 963 F. Supp. 2d 427; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109945; 2013 WL 3993259; Civil Action No. 08-5247
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 08-5247
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Pa.
Log In