History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tracy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
23 A.3d 612
| Pa. Commw. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Tracy, a Illinois attorney, ran for Lieutenant Governor in 2010 and hired Barrett as campaign manager for Jan 3–Feb 2, 2010 at $3,000 plus a cell phone stipend.
  • Barrett filed for unemployment benefits with the Erie UC Center; the Center awarded benefits for weeks including Jan 9 and Jan 16–Feb 6, 2010, which Tracy appealed.
  • The referee found Barrett was an independent contractor, not an employee, and eligible for benefits under §402(h).
  • The Board affirmed, finding Barrett was subject to Tracy's control and not engaged in an independent business, thus not self-employed and ineligible under §4(l)(2)(B).
  • Key witnesses testified regarding control: Tracy claimed no regular hours or training; Hodas testified that Barrett was an independent contractor; Barrett testified he worked daily but followed guidance rather than being tightly controlled.
  • The Commonwealth Court reversed, holding the Board erred in applying the control/independence analysis and that Barrett was independent contractor, not an employee.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Barrett was an independent contractor, not an employee Tracy contends Barrett was an employee subject to control and direction Board contends Barrett was not independently established and was controlled by Tracy Court held Barrett was an independent contractor; error in Board's employee finding
Whether the record supports control by Tracy over Barrett Tracy argues lack of regular supervision and hours indicates no control Board argues Barrett was under Tracy's control and direction Court found insufficient evidence of control to establish an employee relationship

Key Cases Cited

  • Beacon Flag Car Co. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 910 A.2d 103 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006) (employer-employee determination framework)
  • Venango Newspapers v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 158 Pa.Cmwlth. 379, 631 A.2d 1384 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1993) (profit/loss risk and independent business factors guide self-employment inquiry)
  • Pavalonis v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 57 Pa.Cmwlth. 289, 426 A.2d 215 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1981) (factors including training and hours influence employee status)
  • CE Credits Online v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 946 A.2d 1162 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008) (control and independence assessed in totality of relationship)
  • Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 957 A.2d 786 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008) (profit/loss risk as indicator of independent business)
  • Erie Independence House, Inc. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 126 Pa. Cmwlth. 358, 559 A.2d 994 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (control encompasses both nature of work and manner of performance)
  • Buchanan v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 135 Pa.Cmwlth. 567, 581 A.2d 1005 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1990) (employee/self-employment determination is a question of law subject to review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tracy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 21, 2011
Citation: 23 A.3d 612
Docket Number: 2098 C.D. 2010
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.