History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 Ohio 4901
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Tipton v. Tipton, Fairfield County, Ohio, 5th Appellate Dist., judgment entered Nov. 4, 2013, affirming in part, reversing in part and remanding.
  • Melissa Tipton is residential parent; Jason Tipton is nonresidential parent and appellant.
  • Three children: Jason A., Jr.; Jordan M.; Joshua W.; divorce filed March 12, 2012; Appellant failed to answer or appear at final hearing.
  • Trial court granted Melissa divorce on extreme cruelty, gross neglect, incompatibility; awarded Melissa residential custody and Appellant parenting time as agreed.
  • Parties had no real property or retirement assets; debts and personal property divided; child support ordered; health insurance provided through JFS.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Asset division: whether required findings and valuations were made Tipton contends court failed to value major assets and to include written findings. Tipton argues discretion in division should prevail without rigid valuations. Sustained in part (need for valuations/findings).
Specific parenting time schedule Tipton argues no explicit schedule as required by statute. Tipton asserts reasonable time with children is sufficient. Sustained.
Tax dependency exemptions allocation Tipton challenges allocation for 2012- and future years. Tipton argues court acted within discretion. Overruled.
Child support calculation and health-care expenses Tipton argues calculation/expense allocation err; evidence sufficient. Tipton contends calculation supported by record. Overruled.

Key Cases Cited

  • Martin v. Martin, 18 Ohio St.3d 292 (Ohio 1985) (abuse of discretion standard for property division)
  • Middendorf v. Middendorf, 82 Ohio St.3d 397 (Ohio 1998) (requires consideration of statutory factors in property division)
  • Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (abuse of discretion standard in family matters)
  • Neel v. Neel, 113 Ohio App.3d 24 (Ohio App.3d 1996) (requires consideration of factors in equitable division; statutory guidance)
  • Booth v. Booth, 44 Ohio St.3d 142 (Ohio 1989) (abuse of discretion standard in child support)
  • Bechtol v. Bechtol, 49 Ohio St.3d 21 (Ohio 1990) (standard for reviewing custody/related issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tipton v. Tipton
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 4, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 4901; 13-CA-19
Docket Number: 13-CA-19
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Tipton v. Tipton, 2013 Ohio 4901