History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
950 N.E.2d 578
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • In Sept. 2009, Nancee Thomas filed a putative class action against Jackson Hewitt for alleged CSOA violations in RAL practice.
  • The complaint alleged JH failed to register as a CSO, obtain a surety bond, provide a 3-day rescission, and furnish required disclosures.
  • The action sought damages for Ohio residents who used JH’s RAL services.
  • JH moved to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) and 12(B)(7), arguing Thomases weren’t buyers, JH not a CSO, no injury, and improper class joinder.
  • Thomas later amended the complaint to add Paul Thomas; the motion to dismiss applied to the amended complaint.
  • The trial court dismissed, ruling JH was not a CSO and that the Thomases failed to allege damages; Thomases appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Thomases alleged cognizable CSOA damages Thomas alleged injury from CSOA noncompliance and fees paid Thomas failed to allege actual injury; CSOA damages not proven Dismissal affirmed; no damages pled
Whether the CSOA applies to Thomases and Jackson Hewitt CSOA could apply; Thomases were damaged by CSO violations Applicability unclear; need injury allegations Court assumed CSOA could apply but found damages lacking
Whether Thomases are “buyers” under R.C. 4712.01(A) Thomases used RAL services and paid fees Inquiry unnecessary due to lack of damages Not reached; damages fatal to complaint
Whether Jackson Hewitt is a CSO under R.C. 4712.01(C) JH’s status as CSO is alleged JH is not a CSO Not reached; damages fatal to complaint

Key Cases Cited

  • Byrd v. Faber, 57 Ohio St.3d 56 (Ohio 1991) (motion to dismiss standards; presumption of truth for allegations)
  • O’Brien v. Univ. Community Tenants Union, Inc., 42 Ohio St.2d 242 (Ohio 1975) (scope of review for Civ.R. 12(B)(6) dismissals)
  • McGlone v. Grimshaw, 86 Ohio App.3d 279 (Ohio App.3d 1993) (review of complaint and factual allegations; ruling on injury)
  • State ex rel. Hickman v. Capots, 45 Ohio St.3d 324 (Ohio 1989) (presumed truth not given to legal conclusions)
  • Harper v. Jackson Hewitt, 227 W.Va. 142, 706 S.E.2d 63 (West Virginia 2010) (CSO status and buyer injury discussed in WV)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 10, 2011
Citation: 950 N.E.2d 578
Docket Number: No. 95019
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.