Terry-Hall v. State
312 Ga. 250
Ga.2021Background
- In March 2015 a Henry County grand jury indicted Brandon Terry-Hall on multiple counts arising from a September 2012 burglary and shootings, including malice and felony murder, burglary, armed robbery, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and a firearms count.
- On September 15, 2015 Terry-Hall pleaded guilty to four counts: felony murder (predicated on aggravated assault), first-degree burglary, armed robbery, and false imprisonment; the remaining counts were nolle prossed.
- On October 15, 2015 the trial court sentenced him to concurrent life terms on felony murder and armed robbery, plus consecutive 20-year and 10-year terms on burglary and false imprisonment.
- On February 27, 2019 Terry-Hall filed a pro se motion for an out-of-time appeal arguing the State’s factual basis at the plea hearing was inadequate and that his plea was involuntary; he did not assert that counsel failed to file a timely appeal or motion to withdraw the plea.
- The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing; the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed, concluding Terry-Hall waived ineffective-assistance-based claims by not raising them below and that claims attacking the plea’s factual basis could not be reached because no out-of-time appeal was granted.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether trial court abused its discretion by denying an out-of-time appeal without a hearing based on ineffective assistance of counsel | Terry-Hall: counsel was ineffective for failing to file a timely notice of appeal or motion to withdraw plea, entitling him to an out-of-time appeal | State: Terry-Hall never alleged in his motion that counsel’s deficient performance deprived him of an appeal; claim was not raised below and thus waived | Court: Waived—no hearing required where defendant did not allege counsel thwarted a timely appeal; denial affirmed |
| Whether the State provided an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea and whether counsel was ineffective for failing to object | Terry-Hall: the factual basis at the plea hearing was inadequate; counsel failed to object under the Uniform Superior Court Rules | State: These claims cannot be reviewed on direct appeal absent an out-of-time appeal | Court: No jurisdiction to review plea-challenge claims because out-of-time appeal was not granted; claims barred |
Key Cases Cited
- Turner v. State, 281 Ga. 435 (explaining that challenges to a guilty plea on direct appeal must be resolvable from the record)
- Collier v. State, 307 Ga. 363 (holding a defendant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal when counsel’s deficient performance deprived him of an appeal)
- Clark v. State, 310 Ga. 489 (review standard and duty to hold evidentiary hearing when ineffective-assistance allegation is properly raised)
- Ringold v. State, 304 Ga. 875 (asserting that errors not raised in the trial court are generally waived)
- Rutledge v. State, 309 Ga. 508 (pro se allegation that counsel failed to inform defendant of appealable grounds can require inquiry)
- Jones v. State, 308 Ga. 337 (trial court abused discretion by denying without hearing pro se motion alleging abandonment by plea counsel)
- Burley v. State, 308 Ga. 650 (discussing circumstances warranting an evidentiary hearing on out-of-time appeal motions)
- Barnes v. State, 291 Ga. 831 (challenges not raised in the trial court in connection with an out-of-time appeal motion are waived)
- McDaniel v. State, 311 Ga. 367 (reiterating that the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to review plea-challenge claims when no out-of-time appeal is granted)
