Teasley v. State
288 Ga. 468
| Ga. | 2011Background
- Appellant Christopher Teasley and his brothers were convicted of malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault in the 2005 shooting spree that also involved a 15-year-old cousin and James Riden.
- Tyrone Teasley retrieved a gun, Emory Teasley shot at Jones, and Appellant drove the vehicle and helped eject the firearm after the crime.
- The jury also found Appellant guilty of possession of a firearm during a crime and tampering with evidence; the felony murder conviction was vacated by operation of law, and the aggravated assault of Riden merged into malice murder.
- Appellant drove his brothers to the pool hall/killing scene, remained present, and aided in the confrontation and flight from the scene.
- Tyrone threw the gun out the car window as Appellant drove away, which the State argued supported Appellant’s status as a party to the crimes.
- The trial court sentenced Appellant to life for murder, five years for the weapons charge, 20 years for aggravated assault, and three years for tampering with evidence; a new-trial motion was denied and appeal followed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether there was sufficient evidence Appellant was a party to the crimes | Teasley was merely present at the scene. | Teasley was a party to the crimes through presence, companionship, and conduct. | Evidence supported party liability for all crimes. |
| Whether the tampering with evidence conviction and sentence were proper given Tyrone’s direct commission | Appellant aided in concealing the firearm and coordinated the flight. | Tampering was performed as part of a conspiracy/accomplice liability for the crimes. | Tampering sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing on that conviction. |
Key Cases Cited
- Walsh v. State, 269 Ga. 427 (1998) (presence can support party liability when coupled with conduct.)
- Yancey v. State, 281 Ga. 664 (2004) (driver role and aiding conduct supports liability.)
- Lucky v. State, 286 Ga. 478 (2010) (slight circumstances can support inference of collusion when relatives are involved.)
- Adamson v. State, 238 Ga.App. 105 (1999) (proof of joint participation may be inferred from presence and conduct.)
- Beadles v. State, 259 Ga. 519 (1989) (accomplice liability for crimes can impute acts to another.)
- Cooper v. State, 287 Ga. 861 (2010) (evidence of acts by co-conspirator supports liability for related offenses.)
- White v. State, 287 Ga. 713 (2010) (apparent limitation on certain sentencing when other defendant committed the act.)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (sufficiency standard for criminal convictions.)
