History
  • No items yet
midpage
148 Conn. App. 279
Conn. App. Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Married 1965; dissolution judgment 2008 with alimony of $8000/month plus mortgage and maintenance costs; alimony to increase to $12,000/month after sale of marital home.
  • Oldest daughter has Down syndrome and is in defendant's care.
  • Plaintiff sought postjudgment modification in 2011; defendant sought contempt in 2011 for missed alimony payments.
  • June 29, 2012 hearing: both sides filed financial affidavits; plaintiff claimed $17,009 net per month; defendant claimed $1,775.31 net per month.
  • August 8, 2012: court denied modification, found plaintiff in contempt for failing to pay full alimony, and ordered arrearage and attorney’s fees; December 2012: defendant sought appellate fees; judgment reaffirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there a substantial change in circumstances warranting modification? Talbot produced uncontroverted evidence of illness and income drop. Change in circumstances did not justify modification given ongoing needs and resources. Court acted within discretion; no substantial change required modification.
Was the contempt finding supported? Contempt arose from health-related nonpayment; not willful. Nonpayment was willful; plaintiff prioritized personal spending over support. Contempt upheld; findings supported by record.
Were appellate attorney’s fees properly awarded? Fees improper under §46b-62/§46b-87 given financial hardship. Court reasonably awarded fees to defend appeal given disparity in finances and need to uphold prior orders. Affirmed award of appellate attorney’s fees.

Key Cases Cited

  • Lev v. Lev, 10 Conn. App. 570 (1987) (standard for substantial change in circumstances in modification cases)
  • In re Leah S., 284 Conn. 685 (2007) (contempt standards and review of underlying order clarity)
  • Oldani v. Oldani, 132 Conn. App. 609 (2011) (appellate review of contempt and related fees)
  • Medvey v. Medvey, 98 Conn. App. 278 (2006) (attorney’s fees considerations in dissolution matters)
  • Taylor v. Taylor, 119 Conn. App. 817 (2010) (46b-62 fee awards in dissolution proceedings)
  • Clement v. Clement, 34 Conn. App. 641 (1994) (fee awards and discretion in divorce cases)
  • Loughlin v. Loughlin, 280 Conn. 632 (2006) (utilization of changed circumstances and related evidentiary considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Talbot v. Talbot
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Feb 18, 2014
Citations: 148 Conn. App. 279; 85 A.3d 40; 2014 WL 547728; 2014 Conn. App. LEXIS 60; AC35032
Docket Number: AC35032
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In