History
  • No items yet
midpage
87 So. 3d 444
Miss.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Martin contracted with Lyons for appellate work May 2006–Aug. 2007; Martin paid invoices until June 2007.
  • Lyons withdrew from a Supreme Court appeal due to nonpayment and potential conflict; Lyons sought payment.
  • Lyons filed a county court action August 25, 2008 for breach of contract/open account; damages $14,543.19; fees $4,847.73.
  • Martin answered but participated little, failed to respond to discovery and attend hearings; sanctions were imposed against Martin.
  • County court awarded damages and attorney’s fees; Martin appealed to circuit court.
  • Circuit court reversed the fee award, holding the contract was oral and not an open account; Lyons appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether circuit court had jurisdiction on appeal from county court Lyons argues failure to post 11-51-79 bond nullifies jurisdiction Martin argues the cost bond sufficed; supersedeas not required for jurisdiction Circuit court had appellate jurisdiction; cost bond sufficed; supersedeas not jurisdictional here
Whether county court properly awarded attorney’s fees under open-account theory Lyons entitled to fees under 11-53-81 as open account Martin contends contract, not open account; 11-53-81 not applicable Attorney’s fees statute applied; open account existed; award reinstated

Key Cases Cited

  • Sumner v. City of Como Democratic Executive Comm., 972 So.2d 616 (Miss. 2008) (cash payment satisfied cost-bond requirements for appeal)
  • Johnson v. Evans, 517 So.2d 570 (Miss. 1987) (cost bond guarantees subject-matter jurisdiction for appeal)
  • Parkman v. Miss. State Highway Comm’n, 250 So.2d 637 (Miss. 1969) (open appeal bond principles for jurisdiction)
  • Mauldin Co. v. Lee Tractor Co. of Mississippi, Inc., 920 So.2d 513 (Miss.Ct.App.2006) (open account defined; unwritten contract; fees under 11-53-81)
  • Michael S. Fawer v. Evans, 627 So.2d 829 (Miss. 1993) (fees in open-account prosecutions; unwritten contracts)
  • Richards v. Gulfco Electronics Corp., 360 So.2d 609 (Miss. Ct. App. 1978) (open account vs. series of contracts; professional services)
  • Smith Brothers Trucking of Mount Airy, Inc., 2008 WL 4681641 (N.D.N.C. 2008) (non-binding; open account distinction not met)
  • Cox v. Howard, Weil, Labouisse, Friedrichs, Inc., 619 So.2d 908 (Miss. 1993) (definition of open account; continuing transactions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: T. Jackson Lyons & Associates, P.A. v. Precious T. Martin, Sr. & Associates, PLLC
Court Name: Mississippi Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 12, 2012
Citations: 87 So. 3d 444; 2012 Miss. LEXIS 188; 2012 WL 1216219; No. 2011-CA-00167-SCT
Docket Number: No. 2011-CA-00167-SCT
Court Abbreviation: Miss.
Log In