Stickley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
431 Md. 347
| Md. | 2013Background
- Petitioner Stickley, a passenger in a car accident, sustained serious injuries while her husband died; they carried a motor vehicle liability policy with State Farm Auto and a personal liability umbrella policy with State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
- The umbrella policy contains a household exclusion denying bodily injury claims against a household member; Petitioner challenges its validity under § 19-504.1 of the Insurance Article.
- § 19-504.1 requires insurers to offer family-member liability coverage at the same amount as nonfamily-member coverage under private passenger motor vehicle liability policies when that liability coverage exceeds minimum statutory amounts.
- Lower courts held the umbrella policy is not a private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance policy, thus § 19-504.1 does not apply to it, and the household exclusion remains valid.
- The Maryland Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether an umbrella policy falls within § 19-504.1 and whether enforcing the household exclusion contravenes public policy.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does § 19-504.1 apply to umbrella policies? | Stickley contends umbrella policies are private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance under the statute. | State Farm argues umbrella policies are not private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance and thus § 19-504.1 does not require equal family coverage. | Umbrella policy is not private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance; § 19-504.1 does not apply. |
| Is enforcing the household exclusion against public policy when § 19-504.1 does not apply? | Public policy supports voiding the exclusion to ensure family-member recovery beyond minimums. | Public policy favors upholding the household exclusion consistent with statutory framework for compulsory auto insurance; legislature did not abrogate it entirely. | Household exclusion remains valid and enforceable; no public policy violation. |
Key Cases Cited
- Bowen v. City of Annapolis, 402 Md. 587 (Md. 2007) (statutory interpretation guiding plain meaning of language)
- State Farm v. Nationwide, 307 Md. 631 (Md. 1986) (public policy considerations in household exclusions)
- Stearman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 381 Md. 436 (Md. 2004) (public policy and interpretation of household exclusion)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hart, 327 Md. 526 (Md. 1992) (statutory basis for household exclusion invalidity when applicable)
- Neale v. Wright, 322 Md. 8 (Md. 1991) (attachment of private passenger motor vehicle liability to automobiles, not individuals)
