History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steven Rann v. Mike Atchison
689 F.3d 832
7th Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Rann was convicted in Illinois state court in 2006 of two counts of criminal sexual assault and one count of possession of child pornography.
  • Evidence included images from a memory card and a zip drive obtained via a private search by the victim and her mother, not by police.
  • Trial counsel did not move to suppress the images found on the memory card and zip drive.
  • Rann pursued direct appeal, then a state post-conviction habeas petition; the Illinois courts rejected his ineffective assistance claim.
  • Rann filed a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); the district court denied relief, and appellate review followed to assess AEDPA standards.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether failure to suppress private-search evidence was prejudicial Rann argues failure to suppress violated Fourth Amendment and prejudiced trial Appellate court held no Fourth Amendment violation; ineffectiveness claim lacks merit No reversible error; Runyan-based scope ruling supports no prejudice
Whether police viewing private-search images exceeded the private search Police exceeded private search when viewing images without a warrant Police did not exceed the scope of the private search under Jacobsen and Runyan Police did not exceed the private search; Fourth Amendment not violated
Whether the AEDPA standard was properly applied State court applied federal law unreasonably, warranting relief State court properly applied Strickland and Supreme Court standards State court's application was not unreasonable; habeas petition denied

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Runyan, 275 F.3d 449 (5th Cir. 2001) (adopts private search scope rule for digital storage devices)
  • United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984) (government invasions tested against scope of private search)
  • Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921) (Fourth Amendment does not apply to private searches)
  • Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971) (private search evidence admissibility without warrant for police)
  • Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976) (habeas relief not available for Fourth Amendment claims already litigated)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Steven Rann v. Mike Atchison
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Aug 3, 2012
Citation: 689 F.3d 832
Docket Number: 11-3502
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.