History
  • No items yet
midpage
Steven Davis v. United States
110 A.3d 590
D.C.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Davis was convicted of possession of cocaine after a bench trial.
  • The trial court denied Davis's motion to suppress two blue ziplock bags of cocaine found in his vehicle.
  • Officer Smith entered Davis's running, unattended vehicle to move it out of the middle of a parking lot blocking traffic.
  • The officer saw cocaine in plain view on the driver’s side floorboard and recovered it after entering the car.
  • EMTs were attending to Davis when the officer entered the vehicle; Davis was assisted to the ambulance and later arrested.
  • Davis argued the Fourth Amendment prohibited entering the car to move it and that the plain-view seizure should be suppressed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether entry into the car was lawful under community caretaking. Davis: entry improper since no basis to enter car or move it. Davis: caretaking not applicable; could have waited or towed without entering. Yes, entry reasonable under caretaking.
Whether the plain-view seizure was valid following lawful entry. Davis: plain-view seizure invalid if entry unlawful. Davis: no alternative basis for seizure; not a search for evidence. Yes, seizure valid in plain view after lawful entry.

Key Cases Cited

  • Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (U.S. Supreme Court 1973) (establishes community caretaking and non-criminal entry rationales)
  • South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (U.S. Supreme Court 1976) (permits incidental detention/removal of vehicles under caretaking function)
  • Jones v. United States, 330 A.2d 248 (D.C. 1974) (caretaking function related to vehicle obstruction permitted)
  • Sanchez, 612 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2010) (community caretaking allowed noncriminal entries to address safety)
  • Carroway, 2013 WL 3329453 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2013) (caretaking application to vehicle safety and obstruction cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Steven Davis v. United States
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 26, 2015
Citation: 110 A.3d 590
Docket Number: 13-CM-817
Court Abbreviation: D.C.