History
  • No items yet
midpage
Stenner v. Commissioner of Correction
144 Conn. App. 371
Conn. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Stenner was arrested on August 22, 2001, for murder of Robert Schmidt, charged under § 53a-54a and § 53a-8, and later convicted by a jury and sentenced to 60 years; the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed.
  • On August 12, 2011, Stenner filed an amended habeas petition alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel for not adequately investigating and presenting a coconspirator motive theory, among other claims.
  • The habeas court denied the writ of habeas corpus and refused to certify the denial for appeal.
  • Stenner sought certification to appeal via an application for waiver of fees and counsel, asserting a Sixth Amendment confrontation claim in the grounds for appeal.
  • The habeas court denied certification; Stenner appeals arguing abuse of discretion and ineffective assistance based on trial conduct.
  • The appellate court dismissed the appeal, holding the issues raised on appeal were not raised in the petition for certification or the waiver application.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the habeas court abused its discretion in denying certification to appeal. Stenner argues abuse of discretion due to unresolved ineffective-assistance claims. Court correctly denied certification since issues not raised in petition. No abuse of discretion; dismissal affirmed.
Whether the denied writ should be reviewed given arguments about trial counsel's effectiveness. Ineffective assistance undermines habeas relief and warrants review. Issues not raised in certification waiver cannot be reviewed. Not reviewable; claims not raised.

Key Cases Cited

  • Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction, 112 Conn. App. 137 (2009) (two-step abuse-of-discretion and merits review standard)
  • Campbell v. Commissioner of Correction, 132 Conn. App. 263 (2011) (claims not raised cannot be reviewed on appeal from habeas denial)
  • Tutson v. Commissioner of Correction, 144 Conn. App. 203 (2013) (review limitations when issues omitted from petition)
  • Simms v. Warden, 229 Conn. 178 (1994) (two-pronged test for certiorari review of habeas denial)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Stenner v. Commissioner of Correction
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Jul 23, 2013
Citation: 144 Conn. App. 371
Docket Number: AC 34164
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.