History
  • No items yet
midpage
173 Conn. App. 64
Conn. App. Ct.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Tauren Williams-Bey filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in the Hartford Superior Court; the trial court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
  • The Appellate Court initially reversed, finding the trial court’s judgment form improper and directing entry of judgment denying the motion to correct an illegal sentence (State v. Williams-Bey, 167 Conn. App. 744 (2016)).
  • After the Appellate Court decision, the Connecticut Supreme Court decided State v. Delgado and State v. Boyd, clarifying jurisdictional limits over motions to correct illegal sentences.
  • The Supreme Court sua sponte ordered the Appellate Court to reconsider its ruling in light of Delgado and Boyd.
  • On reconsideration, the Appellate Court concluded Delgado controlled and affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the motion to correct an illegal sentence.
  • The Appellate Court therefore affirmed the trial court’s dismissal, holding it lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion under the principles announced in Delgado.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the motion to correct an illegal sentence State: trial court properly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction Williams-Bey: trial court had jurisdiction and relief was available Held: trial court lacked jurisdiction; dismissal affirmed
Whether the Appellate Court’s earlier remedy (directing entry of judgment denying the motion) was proper State: remedy was improper after Delgado Williams-Bey: earlier Appellate Court decision was correct Held: Delgado controls; earlier Appellate Court decision reconsidered and reversed insofar as it disturbed trial court dismissal
Effect of State v. Delgado and State v. Boyd on motions to correct illegal sentence State: Delgado/Boyd narrow jurisdiction; support dismissal Williams-Bey: those cases do not permit dismissal in this instance Held: Delgado/Boyd govern; they constrain trial court jurisdiction and require dismissal

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Delgado, 323 Conn. 801 (Conn. 2016) (clarified limits on trial court jurisdiction over motions to correct illegal sentence)
  • State v. Boyd, 323 Conn. 816 (Conn. 2016) (companion decision reinforcing Delgado’s jurisdictional rule)
  • State v. Williams-Bey, 167 Conn. App. 744 (Conn. App. 2016) (Appellate Court’s original decision remanded for reconsideration in light of Delgado and Boyd)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Williams-Bey
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: May 9, 2017
Citations: 173 Conn. App. 64; 164 A.3d 31; 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 188; AC37430
Docket Number: AC37430
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    State v. Williams-Bey, 173 Conn. App. 64