2019 Ohio 1159
Ohio Ct. App.2019Background
- Trevor P. White pleaded guilty (Jan. 30, 2017) to multiple felonies including murder, aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, aggravated arson, tampering with evidence, breaking and entering, abuse of a corpse, involuntary manslaughter, and RICO-like corruption; firearm specifications accompanied several charges.
- The trial court sentenced White to 18 years to life. He did not appeal that sentence.
- On February 23, 2018, White filed a post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea under Crim.R. 32.1, relying exclusively on this court’s prior decision in State v. Kubisen.
- The trial court denied White’s motion; White appealed that denial to the Ninth District Court of Appeals.
- White’s sole argument was that Kubisen required reversal because it narrowly defined the form of “a plea of guilty” under Crim.R. 11(C), and his plea purportedly did not meet that form.
- The Ninth District reversed course on Kubisen’s interpretation as too narrow, declined to apply Kubisen to permit plea withdrawal here, and affirmed the trial court’s denial of White’s motion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying White’s Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea based solely on this court’s decision in Kubisen | White: Kubisen requires a specific verbal form of “a plea of guilty” under Crim.R. 11(C); his plea did not satisfy that form so withdrawal is warranted | State: Kubisen misinterpreted Crim.R. 11(C); the rule does not mandate the narrow verbal-form requirement Kubisen announced, and White’s motion fails for relying solely on Kubisen | The court overruled Kubisen’s narrow reading, held Crim.R. 11(C) does not limit the form of “a plea of guilty” as Kubisen stated, and affirmed denial of White’s motion |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Veney, 897 N.E.2d 621 (Ohio 2008) (Crim.R. 11(C) prescribes procedure and required colloquy before accepting a felony plea)
- Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, ? (Ohio 2003) (courts should correct prior erroneous appellate precedent)
