State v. Turner
48 N.E.3d 981
Ohio Ct. App.2015Background
- Officer observed Turner following another car about one car-length at the 35 mph speed limit; undercover officer relayed this to a patrol officer who stopped Turner as he turned into his driveway.
- When officers approached with the driver’s door open, they smelled raw marijuana; a records check showed Turner had a prior cultivation conviction.
- Vehicle search revealed a small bag of raw marijuana in the console, three live marijuana starter plants in an unsealed box in the back seat, and hydroponic cultivation equipment.
- Officers went to Turner’s house; upon the girlfriend opening the door an officer smelled raw marijuana and saw plastic bags associated with packaging; officers performed a protective sweep and observed marijuana growing in plain view.
- Approximately one hour later a search warrant was obtained (affidavit recited the traffic stop, odor from the car, plants in the car, odor from the house, and Turner’s prior cultivation conviction); a warrant search yielded firearms, seeds, live plants, paraphernalia, processed marijuana, scales, cash, and a phone.
- Turner moved to suppress; the trial court credited officer testimony, denied suppression; Turner pled no contest and appealed the denial of the suppression motion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether traffic stop was supported by reasonable suspicion | Officer observed unsafe following (insufficient space) — valid traffic offense stop | Stop was unreasonable and tainted subsequent searches | Stop was supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion; stop valid |
| Whether odor of raw marijuana justified vehicle search | Odor provided probable cause to search car | Odor insufficient or not credibly established | Trial court credited odor; vehicle search was proper |
| Whether affidavit supported probable cause for home search | Plants in car + Turner drove them home + prior cultivation conviction gave fair probability of evidence at home | Affidavit omitted some vehicle findings and protective sweep observations; insufficient nexus to home | Affidavit provided sufficient nexus and probable cause for warrant |
| Whether evidence should be suppressed despite potential infirmities | State relied on valid stop, odor, and warrant | Turner argued stop and/or warrant defects required suppression | Court affirmed denial of suppression; conviction/sentence affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (Terry stop/limited detention standard)
- Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) (de novo review of Fourth Amendment legal questions mixed with factual findings)
- State v. Burnside, 100 Ohio St.3d 152 (2003) (trial court as factfinder on suppression; appellate deference to factual findings)
- Dayton v. Erickson, 76 Ohio St.3d 3 (1996) (traffic stops permissible on reasonable articulable suspicion of traffic offense)
- State v. Mays, 119 Ohio St.3d 406 (2008) (validity of stops prompted by reasonable and articulable suspicion)
