History
  • No items yet
midpage
367 N.C. 474
N.C.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant and an unidentified man robbed S&J Grocery at gunpoint; money and cigarettes were taken, and a shot was fired at the clerk.
  • Defendant was convicted of second-degree kidnapping, firearm possession by a felon, assault with intent to kill, armed robbery, and habitual felon status; jury did not consider attempted second-degree kidnapping.
  • Court of Appeals reversed the kidnapping conviction for insufficient evidence of removal, and remanded for potential judgment on lesser included offenses.
  • State petitioned for discretionary review; this Court allowed limited remand to consider whether the acts satisfied attempted second-degree kidnapping.
  • Court of Appeals on remand concluded the issue was not preserved; this Court now addresses whether evidence supports attempted second-degree kidnapping and whether the conviction should be treated as a lesser included offense.
  • Court holds that the State presented sufficient evidence of attempted removal and that the verdict for second-degree kidnapping can be treated as a verdict for the lesser included offense of attempted second-degree kidnapping.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
May the State obtain review ex mero motu for a lesser offense? Stokes argues procedural preservation blocked review. Stokes contends no alternative argument permitted on appeal by State. Yes; Court may recognize lesser offense ex mero motu.
Does the State's evidence support attempted second-degree kidnapping separate from armed robbery? State asserts removal/attempted removal shown by move to back of store and into car. Defendant argues movements were part of robbery, not separate kidnapping. Yes; evidence supports attempted removal and thus attempted second-degree kidnapping.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Jolly, 297 N.C. 121 (1979) (jury verdict on greater offense can support lesser included offense)
  • State v. Barnette, 304 N.C. 447 (1981) (verdict supported by lesser included offense remand)
  • State v. Dawkins, 305 N.C. 289 (1982) (where greater offense lacks elements but lesser offense exists)
  • State v. Robinson, 310 N.C. 530 (1984) (verdict on greater offense may reflect lesser included offense)
  • State v. Gooch, 307 N.C. 253 (1982) (instructional error can render verdict as lesser offense)
  • State v. Corley, 310 N.C. 40 (1984) (failure to submit essential element can convert to lesser offense)
  • State v. Freeman, 307 N.C. 445 (1983) (ex mero motu recognition of lesser offense remand; preservation not required)
  • State v. Irwin, 304 N.C. 93 (1981) (double jeopardy concerns in kidnapping vs. felonies)
  • State v. Johnson, 337 N.C. 212 (1994) (test for danger beyond inherent risk in underlying felony)
  • State v. Boyce, 361 N.C. 670 (2007) (separate restraint and removal can constitute kidnapping as a distinct offense)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Stokes
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Apr 11, 2014
Citations: 367 N.C. 474; 756 S.E.2d 32; 2014 N.C. LEXIS 290; 2014 WL 1477990; No. 94PA13-2
Docket Number: No. 94PA13-2
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In