History
  • No items yet
midpage
807 N.W.2d 15
Wis. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Stewart was arrested for possession with intent to deliver cocaine after a confidential informant, via an intermediary 'Black,' reported Stewart would bring 13.5 ounces of cocaine to Milwaukee.
  • The informant identified Stewart from photos after learning he would arrive on a Las Vegas–Milwaukee flight around 11:30 p.m. on March 10, 2009.
  • Agent Gray corroborated the informant by verifying the Las Vegas flight to Milwaukee and confirming Stewart was on it, then observed Stewart at Mitchell Airport around midnight.
  • Stewart exited the terminal with a white plastic bag; police believed it could contain the 13.5 ounces of cocaine and he tossed the bag into a car trunk before being arrested.
  • A search of the car’s trunk recovered approximately 13.5 ounces of cocaine and 2 ounces of marijuana.
  • Stewart moved to suppress the evidence on grounds of no probable cause and lack of standing; the trial court denied; he pled guilty to possession with intent to deliver cocaine.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Probable cause to arrest Stewart Stewart argues no probable cause based on informant reliability State relies on totality of the circumstances including Romero Probable cause exists
Validity of the trunk search incident to arrest Stewart challenged standing to challenge the search State argues search was valid as incident to arrest Trunk search reasonable and valid

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Nieves, 304 Wis. 2d 182 (Wis. App. 2007) (probable cause standard for arrest; objective standard)
  • State v. Romero, 317 Wis. 2d 12 (Wis. 2009) (totality of circumstances supports probable cause; corroboration and reliability of informant)
  • Arizona v. Gant, 129 S. Ct. 1710 (U.S. 2009) (search incident to arrest standards for vehicle)
  • State v. Dearborn, 327 Wis. 2d 252 (Wis. 2010) (Wisconsin adoption of Gant framework)
  • State v. Smiter, 331 Wis. 2d 431 (Wis. App. 2011) (affirming search of vehicle after drug arrest; reasonable grounds)
  • United States v. Most, 876 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (distinction between probable cause and mere possession of bag prior to search)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Stewart
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Date Published: Oct 12, 2011
Citations: 807 N.W.2d 15; 337 Wis. 2d 618; 2011 WI App 152; 2011 Wisc. App. LEXIS 953; No. 2010AP2553-CR
Docket Number: No. 2010AP2553-CR
Court Abbreviation: Wis. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Stewart, 807 N.W.2d 15