History
  • No items yet
midpage
218 N.C. App. 267
N.C. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant was convicted of eluding arrest with a motor vehicle, assault with a deadly weapon on a government official, and resisting a public officer.
  • Evidence shows the vehicle fled from police at high speed, ran a stop sign, and narrowly avoided officers as it accelerated toward them.
  • Officer Battle testified the vehicle approached him, and he had to jump back to avoid being struck; another officer corroborated the danger.
  • Sentencing included 25–30 months for eluding and AWDW and 60 days for resisting an officer; defendant appeals.
  • Defendant argues (a) failure to instruct on a lesser offense and (b) ineffective assistance of counsel; the court addresses both.
  • Court holds no error in omitting the lesser offense instruction and dismisses the ineffective-assistance claim without prejudice for a relief hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Lesser-included offense instruction Defendant asserts error for not instructing on misdemeanor assault on a government official. State argued Batchelor controls; vehicle’s deadly-use should be treated as per Batchelor/Clark outcomes. No reversible error; vehicle deadly weapon as a matter of law; no lesser instruction required.
Ineffective assistance—counsel admissions Defendant contends trial counsel admitted guilt without consent during closing. Citing Harbison/Maready, such admissions constitute per se ineffective assistance; consent unknown. Dismissed without prejudice to allow relief relief hearing on consent issue.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Boozer, 707 S.E.2d 756 (N.C. App. 2011) (plain error when no evidence of lesser offense is presented)
  • State v. Batchelor, 606 S.E.2d 422 (N.C. App. 2005) (deadly weapon determination often factual; keep jury option on lesser offense)
  • State v. Clark, 689 S.E.2d 555 (N.C. App. 2007) (whether deadly weapon instruction should go to jury depends on evidence; distinguish Batchelor)
  • State v. Harbison, 337 S.E.2d 504 (N.C. 1985) (per se ineffective assistance when counsel admits guilt without consent)
  • State v. Maready, 695 S.E.2d 771 (N.C. App. 2010) (remand for evidentiary hearing on consent and relief)
  • State v. Johnson, Unknown (N.C. App. 2011) (recognizes per se ineffective assistance when counsel concedes guilt)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Spencer
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 17, 2012
Citations: 218 N.C. App. 267; 720 S.E.2d 901; 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 71; No. COA11-873
Docket Number: No. COA11-873
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In