History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 Ohio 4019
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant William E. Smith, previously convicted of felonious assault, failed to report to parole or halfway house after release.
  • In 2009, Smith was indicted for escape in Richland County, Ohio, a felony of the second degree.
  • Smith pleaded not guilty in 2013, then changed to no contest in 2014, which the court accepted.
  • The trial court found Smith guilty of escape and sentenced him to two years concurrent with his existing sentence.
  • Appellee State challenges the indictment on lack of territorial jurisdiction and argues the plea colloquy compliance was sufficient.
  • The court held the indictment's phrasing established Ohio, Richland County jurisdiction, and it affirmed the conviction and sentence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Indictment adequately establishes jurisdiction Smith contends the indictment failed to allege the state where the offense occurred. State asserts the indictment language and RC 2901.11(D) establish Ohio jurisdiction. Indictment not defective; jurisdiction established.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Hamilton, 2014-Ohio-3171 (5th Dist Richland 2014) (indictment sufficiency to establish jurisdiction)
  • State v. Williams, 53 Ohio App.3d 1 (10th Dist. 1988) (RC 2901.11(D) presumption when location uncertain)
  • State v. Griggs, 2004-Ohio-4415 (Ohio) (plea-acceptance prejudice requires showing of innocence)
  • State v. Nero, 56 Ohio St.3d 106 (Supreme Court of Ohio, 1990) (Crim.R. 11 prejudice standard)
  • State v. Jones, 116 Ohio St.3d 211 (2007 Ohio) (prejudice analysis for plea errors)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Smith
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 12, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 4019; 14 CA 15
Docket Number: 14 CA 15
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Smith, 2014 Ohio 4019