State v. Simino
397 S.W.3d 11
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2013Background
- Simino was convicted of second-degree murder for Brandi Mathews’ death and received a 20-year sentence, to run consecutive to other sentences.
- State filed a complaint January 5, 2011; Mathews’ death was alleged to be caused by trauma, striking, and choking by Simino; Simino was arrested January 6, 2011.
- Information and later a First Amended Information were filed, adding domestic assault as a basis for the murder charge, with new witnesses listed.
- The case was transferred across counties (Miller to Laclede) and delayed by continuances, change-of-venue/judge motions, and notice issues; Simino filed a speedy-trial request February 22, 2011.
- Dr. Carl Stacy, the chief medical examiner, was unavailable for trial, leading to a State continuance for trial set October 24, 2011; Exhibit 10 (protection order and abuse petition) was admitted at trial over objection.
- The jury, hearing conventional second-degree murder instructions and a felony-murder alternative based on domestic assault, found Simino guilty of second-degree murder.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| speedy-trial dismissal effectiveness | Simino urged dismissal for speedy-trial violation due to delayed proceedings. | State argued delay was justified and defendant contributed to delay via motions. | No abuse of discretion; denial affirmed. |
| Instructional merger doctrine applicability | Merger doctrine barred felony-murder instructions tied to domestic assault. | Statutory felony-murder abrogates merger; submitting both instructions is proper. | No error; submission of Instructions 8 and 9 proper. |
| Admissibility of Exhibit 10 (abuse petition) | Certified abuse petition lacked proper authentication by Mathews as author. | Exhibit 10 is a certified court record admissible under section 490.130; authentication satisfied. | No abuse of discretion; Exhibit 10 properly admitted. |
Key Cases Cited
- Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) (speedy-trial balancing factors)
- State v. Greenlee, 327 S.W.3d 602 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010) (expedition over mere speed; factors for delay)
- State v. Buchli, 152 S.W.3d 289 (Mo. App. W.D. 2004) (speedy-trial delay factors; prejudice criterion)
- State v. Scott, 348 S.W.3d 788 (Mo. App. S.D. 2011) (defendant's delay contributions weighed against him)
- State ex rel. Garcia v. Goldman, 316 S.W.3d 907 (Mo. banc 2010) (presumptive prejudice after eight months; factors analysis)
- State v. Williams, 24 S.W.3d 101 (Mo. App. W.D. 2000) (felony-murder statute abrogation of merger doctrine)
- State v. St. Clair, 262 S.W.2d 25 (Mo. 1953) (certified court records admissible without further identification)
