History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Shoulders
962 N.E.2d 847
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Shoulders was charged with drug trafficking, receiving stolen property (a gun), and possession of criminal tools, with forfeiture and firearm specifications.
  • Prior to trial, Shoulders moved to suppress; an evidentiary hearing was held with Detective Valentino and Sergeant Pillow testifying.
  • Officers, in unmarked cars, observed Moore at a car wash; they intended to question Moore about a threat involving a Browns player and weapons.
  • Shoulders, an employee at the car wash, allegedly ran when officers drew their weapons; he was detained, frisked, and marijuana, phones, cash, and a pistol were found.
  • The pistol was later found to be stolen; other car wash patrons testified Shoulders did not run, contradicting officers' account.
  • The trial court denied the suppression motion; at trial, Counts 2 and 3 were dismissed; Shoulders was convicted of drug trafficking with firearm specification and forfeiture.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly denied suppression Shoulders: unlawful stop and search Shoulders: no reasonable suspicion; stop invalid Appeal sustained; suppression motion granted; remanded

Key Cases Cited

  • Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) (flight alone not per se; totality of circumstances governs reasonable suspicion)
  • Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979) (mere propinquity to others suspected of crime insufficient for search)
  • Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) (personalized suspicion required; guilt must be particularized)
  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (brief, warrantless stop permissible with reasonable suspicion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Shoulders
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 2, 2011
Citation: 962 N.E.2d 847
Docket Number: 95224
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.