State v. Shoulders
962 N.E.2d 847
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Shoulders was charged with drug trafficking, receiving stolen property (a gun), and possession of criminal tools, with forfeiture and firearm specifications.
- Prior to trial, Shoulders moved to suppress; an evidentiary hearing was held with Detective Valentino and Sergeant Pillow testifying.
- Officers, in unmarked cars, observed Moore at a car wash; they intended to question Moore about a threat involving a Browns player and weapons.
- Shoulders, an employee at the car wash, allegedly ran when officers drew their weapons; he was detained, frisked, and marijuana, phones, cash, and a pistol were found.
- The pistol was later found to be stolen; other car wash patrons testified Shoulders did not run, contradicting officers' account.
- The trial court denied the suppression motion; at trial, Counts 2 and 3 were dismissed; Shoulders was convicted of drug trafficking with firearm specification and forfeiture.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court properly denied suppression | Shoulders: unlawful stop and search | Shoulders: no reasonable suspicion; stop invalid | Appeal sustained; suppression motion granted; remanded |
Key Cases Cited
- Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 (2000) (flight alone not per se; totality of circumstances governs reasonable suspicion)
- Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85 (1979) (mere propinquity to others suspected of crime insufficient for search)
- Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) (personalized suspicion required; guilt must be particularized)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) (brief, warrantless stop permissible with reasonable suspicion)
