State v. Sekulic
2017 Ohio 4259
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Sekulic was convicted by jury in Stark County for aggravated murder with a firearm specification, attempted murder, and felonious assault, and sentenced to life without parole plus a firearm spec, with consecutive 11-year term for attempted murder.
- Two December 2015 incidents: November 24, 2015, Sekulic rammed Zeljka’s car after learning of her affair; November 24 injuries included non-fatal harms and then he fled.
- December 8, 2015, Sekulic ambushed Zeljka in the Astoria parking lot, shot her three times at close range, and fled the scene.
- Gligo testified the gun used in the murder was stolen from Gligo’s shop; Sekulic admitted stealing the weapon.
- Sekulic’s trial included testimony that he acted after a period of planning; the jury found aggravated murder with firearm specification, and also found guilt on attempted murder and felonious assault but not on the firearm specification for the November incident.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency and weight of the evidence | Sekulic argues the evidence is insufficient and against weight. | Sekulic contends the state failed to prove prior calculation and design. | Evidence supports both sufficiency and weight; convictions affirmed. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel re voluntary manslaughter instruction | Sekulic alleges counsel failed to request manslaughter instruction. | Counsel’s performance not deficient; no reasonable provocation evidence. | No error; defense not entitled to manslaughter instruction given lack of provocation evidence. |
| Joinder and severance of offenses | Sekulic claims joinder prejudiced by admitting other-acts evidence. | Joinder proper; evidence simple and distinct with proper jury instructions. | Joinder not prejudicial; assignments of error overruled. |
| Consecutive sentences | State contends consecutive terms were properly justified by statute. | Sekulic argues sentences are excessive and not properly supported. | Court properly imposed consecutive sentences; findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) supported; judgment affirmed. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (1997) (weight of evidence standard; credibility of witnesses; standard for manifest weight)
- State v. Conway, 108 Ohio St.3d 214 (2006) (analysis of prior calculation and design; plan to kill)
- State v. Shane, 63 Ohio St.3d 630 (1992) (provocation standard for voluntary manslaughter; objective/subjective test)
- State v. Bonnell, 140 Ohio St.3d 209 (2014) (consecutive sentences findings required by 2929.14(C)(4) but not necessarily recited word-for-word)
- State v. Kalish, 120 Ohio St.3d 23 (2008) (post-Foster sentencing considerations; need to consider 2929.11/2929.12 factors)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for sufficiency of evidence in criminal cases)
