History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Sanders
2012 Ohio 1540
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Sanders stopped for speeding on I-271; active Bedford warrant labeled him armed and dangerous; in-car data and photo linked Sanders to vehicle.
  • Arrest occurred as Sanders began to exit the car; he was handcuffed and placed in custody.
  • Officer Borgia searched the vehicle post-arrest; discovery included marijuana in glove box and trunk; tow was planned.
  • Suppression motion argued the search was pretextual and not a proper inventory search; the court denied suppression.
  • Sanders pled no contest to trafficking, possession, and tools; court sentenced five years for trafficking, agreeing with concurrent terms.
  • On appeal, convictions for drug trafficking and related offenses were affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the inventory search incident to impoundment was valid Sanders argues lack of warrant proof; search biased as investigative State claims valid inventory search under Mesa and Hobbs Inventory search valid; no suppression required
Whether the sentence for drug trafficking was improperly imposed Lessons from Kalish; maximum term based on improper factors Court properly considered required factors and circumstances No abuse of discretion; maximum sentence affirmed
Whether the Crim.R. 11 no-contest colloquy was defective No contest explanation insufficient for nonconstitutional rights Court substantially complied; prejudice not shown Substantial compliance; no prejudice shown; plea valid

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Mesa, 87 Ohio St.3d 105 (1999) (inventory search exception to the warrant requirement)
  • Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 (1987) (inventory searches to protect property and personnel)
  • Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009) (good faith exception to exclude evidence obtained by reliance on invalid warrant)
  • United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) (good faith reliance on magistrate's determination)
  • Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) (vehicle search incident to arrest limitations; applicability to inventory searches)
  • State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1 (2006) (no requirement to make express findings for some sentences)
  • State v. Kalish, 2008-Ohio-4912 (2008) (Kalish standard for reviewing felony sentences)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Sanders
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 5, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 1540
Docket Number: 97120
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.