History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Rayburn
2010 Ohio 5693
Ohio Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Rayburn pled guilty to two counts of sexual battery; trial court sentenced him to eight years total.
  • State dismissed five rape counts and agreed to a consecutive four-year term on each sexual-battery count as part of a plea agreement.
  • Rayburn was informed he would be subject to postrelease control, with a discrepancy noted (five years vs three years) in the judgment.
  • Rayburn filed a delayed appeal challenging his sentence and postrelease-control instructions.
  • The court analyzed whether the sentence is reviewable under R.C. 2953.08(D)(1) given the plea agreement and whether postrelease control raises Double Jeopardy concerns.
  • Court ultimately affirmed the trial court, holding the sentence not reviewable and postrelease control constitutional.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the plea agreement forecloses appellate review of the sentence Rayburn argues the sentence violates statutory maxima and is subject to review Rayburn points to Foster-era sentencing issues and contends his eight-year term exceeds statutory limits Sentence not reviewable under 2953.08(D)(1) due to plea agreement
Whether postrelease control violates Double Jeopardy Rayburn contends PRC punishment constitutes double punishment for same offense Rayburn asserts PRC term and subsequent incarceration improperly double-charged as punishment PRC violation incarceration is not a separate punishment; no Double Jeopardy violation

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173 (2009-Ohio-6434) (allows correction of PRC term under R.C. 2929.191 when imposed post-2006)
  • State v. Martello, 97 Ohio St.3d 398 (2002-Ohio-6661) (jeopardy does not attach when incarcerating for PRC violation; not separate punishment)
  • Brown v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2010-Ohio-872 (Ohio App.3d) (postrelease-control incarceration derives from original sentence)
  • State v. Lee, 2009-Ohio-3423 (Muskingum App. No. 08-CA-70) (jointly recommended sentence generally not subject to review)
  • State v. Reese, 2008-Ohio-1548 (Jefferson App. No. 07 JE 7) (plea agreement jointly recommended sentence not reviewable)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Rayburn
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 18, 2010
Citation: 2010 Ohio 5693
Docket Number: 09CA6
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.