History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 Ohio 3926
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Pillar owned Red Hill Crane & Equipment Rental in Dover; dispute with Weaver over payment for equipment.
  • Weaver’s business incurred repeated invoices from Red Hill; Weaver did not respond.
  • Pillar called Weaver on Aug 7 and Aug 10, 2009; Weaver told him not to call.
  • On Aug 11, 2009, Pillar called again; Weaver filed a police complaint; officer told Pillar to stop.
  • Pillar was charged with three counts of telecommunications harassment under R.C. 2917.21(A)(5); bench trial October 12, 2009; magistrate found him guilty and sentenced.
  • Trial court adopted the magistrate’s decision on December 29, 2011; Pillar appeals raising overbreadth/FDCPA concerns; appellate court affirms.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether R.C. 2917.21(A)(5) is unconstitutionally overbroad or conflicts with the FDCPA. Pillar argues overbreadth and FDCPA conflict. State argues statute is not overbroad and FDCPA does not apply in business debt collection. Not unconstitutionally overbroad; no FDCPA conflict; statute upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Gibbs, 134 Ohio App.3d 247 (Ohio 1999) (not overbroad; permissible for creditor to collect commercial debts)
  • Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm. of New York, 447 U.S. 557 (U.S. 1980) (four-part test for restricting commercial speech)
  • United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co., 509 U.S. 418 (U.S. 1993) (commercial speech protections vary; government interests)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Pillar
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 24, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 3926; 2012 AP 01 0007
Docket Number: 2012 AP 01 0007
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Pillar, 2012 Ohio 3926