History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Pendergrapht
251 Or. App. 630
Or. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant was charged with two counts of failure to appear in the second degree and was appointed counsel after an eligibility affidavit.
  • Defendant pleaded guilty to the two failure-to-appear counts; plea petition noted medications he was taking.
  • At sentencing, the court imposed $400 attorney fees among other costs, without addressing ability to pay.
  • Defendant argued the court lacked authority to impose fees absent evidence that he is or may be able to pay.
  • This appeal focuses on whether ORS 151.505 and ORS 161.665 require record support of ability to pay before imposing fees.
  • The court reverses the attorney fee award but affirms the rest of the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether trial court could impose attorney fees without evidence of ability to pay Kanuch: must show defendant is or may be able to pay Defendant: no record evidence of ability to pay justifies imposition Fees reversed; lack of ability-to-pay record invalidates imposition
Whether the record complies with statutory predicate for costs under ORS 151.505/161.665 State: record supports ability to pay; imposition proper Defendant: record silent or insufficient on resources Imposition improper due to silent record on ability to pay
Whether the remedy is a reversal of the fee award, with other portions affirmed State: error harmless or within scope if other portions valid Defendant: none; remedy should reflect statutory requirements Attorney fee award reversed; remaining judgment affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Bacote v. Johnson, 333 Or 28 (2001) (record must show ability to pay for costs)
  • Kanuch, 231 Or App 20 (2009) (cannot impose fees on silent record; defendant need not prove inability)
  • Normile, 52 Or App 33 (1981) (ability-to-pay determination must be supported by the record)
  • State v. Gray, 113 Or App 552 (1992) (reviewable for excess of statutory authority when imposition violates requirements)
  • State v. Anderson, 113 Or App 416 (1992) (disposition invalid if not consistent with statutory requirements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Pendergrapht
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 8, 2012
Citation: 251 Or. App. 630
Docket Number: D111168M; A148382
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.