History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Pemberton
2014 Ohio 1204
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Pemberton pled guilty on August 5, 2008 to two counts of Felonious Assault (second degree) with gun specifications and one count of Abduction (third degree) under a plea agreement.
  • Sentence totaled 23 years: 8 years on each Felonious Assault count, 3 years for each gun specification, and 1 year for Abduction, with sentences consecutive.
  • Direct appeal deadline passed; initial appeal filed September 26, 2008 and later dismissed; multiple subsequent appeals and petitions followed.
  • In 2011, this Court affirmed convictions in State v. Pemberton, 4th Dist. Gallia No. 10CA4, 2011-Ohio-373 (Pemberton I).
  • In 2012, pro se motions to Correct Unauthorized Sentence and for Re-sentencing argued that Felonious Assault and Abduction should have merged under State v. Johnson; the trial court treated these as postconviction petitions.
  • The trial court denied the petitions in 2013, citing untimeliness and lack of evidentiary substantiation, and determining the issues were new-law-based and not cognizable on postconviction relief.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Should the felonious assault and abduction counts have merged as allied offenses? Pemberton urged Johnson/Rance-based merger as allied offenses. State urged res judicata and that counts were not allied offenses. Issue barred by res judicata; merger merits not reached; petitions dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Are the postconviction petitions timely and within court's jurisdiction? Petitions rooted in new law; should be heard on merits. Petitions untimely under R.C. 2953.21 and res judicata. Petitions untimely; trial court lacked jurisdiction; must dismiss.
Does res judicata bar raising merger/allied-offense issues in postconviction proceedings? Allied-offense dispute could be relitigated postconviction. Issues could have been raised on direct appeal; barred by res judicata. Res judicata applies; issues barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 (2010-Ohio-6314) (merger/ally-offense analysis under Johnson)
  • State v. Rance, 85 Ohio St.3d 632 (1999-Ohio-291) (two-part test for allied offenses)
  • State v. Reynolds, 79 Ohio St.3d 158 (1997) (postconviction relief is collateral attack)
  • State v. Calhoun, 86 Ohio St.3d 279 (1999-Ohio-714) (standards for postconviction relief and evidentiary showing)
  • State v. Szefcyk, 77 Ohio St.3d 93 (1996) (res judicata in postconviction context)
  • State v. Allbaugh, 2013-Ohio-2031 (4th Dist. Athens) (allied-offense claim not raised on direct appeal barred by res judicata)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (syllabus on res judicata framework)
  • State v. Pearson, 2013-Ohio-5690 (5th Dist. No. 13CA59) (identity of merger issue and direct appeal opportunity)
  • State v. Townsend, 2012-Ohio-496 (8th Dist.) (timeliness of merger claim on direct appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Pemberton
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 19, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 1204
Docket Number: 13CA8
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.