State v. Patrick Middleton
A22A0422
Ga. Ct. App.May 6, 2022Background
- On Feb. 15, 2020, Kingsland Police Officer Amanda Graw observed a vehicle failing to maintain its lane on I‑95 outside Kingsland city limits and initiated a traffic stop.
- Graw smelled marijuana, conducted a pat‑down, searched the vehicle, and discovered alprazolam pills and a grinder; a second officer found a digital scale on Middleton.
- Middleton was arrested for unlawful possession of a controlled substance and drug‑related objects and moved to suppress evidence, arguing the stop was unlawful because it occurred outside Kingsland’s municipal boundaries.
- The State stipulated the stop occurred in unincorporated Camden County; Graw testified she had been deputized by the Camden County Sheriff’s Office in 2013 and was authorized to make arrests in the county.
- The trial court granted the suppression motion, finding Graw lacked jurisdiction to initiate the stop outside city limits and noting insufficient evidence about the scope of deputization.
- The Court of Appeals reversed, holding the record showed Graw’s deputization authorized county arrest powers and that law‑enforcement officers retain a duty to enforce the law even off duty, so the stop and ensuing search/arrest were lawful.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a municipal officer who initiated a traffic stop outside city limits had authority to stop and arrest | Middleton: Municipal officers lack arrest/jurisdictional power beyond city limits under OCGA §40‑13‑30; stop occurred in unincorporated county so unlawful | State: Officer was deputized by county sheriff, giving county arrest authority; officers have a general duty to enforce laws on/off duty | Reversed suppression: deputization conferred county authority to arrest; stop and seizure lawful |
Key Cases Cited
- Bacon v. State, 347 Ga. App. 689 (2018) (OCGA §40‑13‑30 limits municipal officers’ arrest powers outside corporate limits)
- Thornton v. State, 310 Ga. 460 (2020) (same limitation on municipal arrest authority absent local or other law)
- Veit v. State, 182 Ga. App. 753 (1987) (deputy sheriff is an agent of the sheriff and has the same powers in discharging duties)
- Perry v. State, 204 Ga. App. 643 (1992) (county police/sheriff have general police power to investigate and make arrests)
- Helton v. State, 284 Ga. App. 777 (2007) (law‑enforcement officers carry duty to enforce law and maintain the peace on and off duty)
- Zilke v. State, 299 Ga. 232 (2016) (statutory territorial limits can restrict an officer’s authority despite general arrest powers)
- State v. Giangregorio, 181 Ga. App. 324 (1986) (an officer sworn as a deputy in another county may effectuate a de jure arrest there)
