State v. Nielsen
2014 UT 10
| Utah | 2014Background
- Victim Trisha Autry (15) disappeared June 24, 2000; her remains and clothing were found nearly one year later buried at the U.S.D.A. Predator Research Facility where Cody Nielsen worked.
- Evidence showed Nielsen had repeatedly followed and paged Trisha; she expressed fear and asked to be picked up from school. Remains showed blunt force trauma; cadaver dogs alerted to a hole Nielsen had dug and burned debris in.
- Nielsen was charged with aggravated murder, kidnapping, aggravated kidnapping, and two counts of desecration of a human body; bound over after preliminary hearing.
- Venue: trial ultimately held in Cache County with jurors summoned from neighboring Box Elder County after earlier (but delayed) grants to transfer venue to Davis and later Box Elder.
- Jury convicted on all counts; sentenced to life without parole for aggravated murder, plus consecutive terms for aggravated kidnapping and desecration. Post-trial proceedings were delayed; appeal followed after the district court disposed of a long-pending new-trial motion.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Nielsen) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Failure to transfer to Davis County | No harm from delay; procedural irregularity not prejudicial | Trial court erred in not promptly transferring; counsel ineffective for not forcing transfer; plain error | Rejected—Nielsen failed to show actual juror bias or prejudice; plain error and ineffective assistance claims fail without prejudice proof |
| Trial held in Cache County with Box Elder jurors | Procedure reasonably protected defendant (Box Elder venire, voir dire, logistics) | Judge abused discretion; jurors bused to Cache County could feel pressure or be biased | Affirmed—trial judge’s choice was within discretion and reasonable given alternatives and protective steps taken |
| Sufficiency of evidence for kidnapping/aggravated kidnapping | Circumstantial evidence (following, victim’s fear, clothing, injuries) supported inference victim was taken unwillingly | Insufficient—no direct evidence victim went with Nielsen against her will | Affirmed—circumstantial evidence sufficient; viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury, reasonable minds need not have had reasonable doubt |
| Bindover on aggravated murder (kidnapping aggravator) | Preliminary hearing presented believable evidence of elements including forcible taking | Insufficient evidence at preliminary hearing to support kidnapping aggravator for bindover | Affirmed—low bindover standard met; preliminary evidence same circumstantial record and sufficed |
| Merger of convictions (kidnapping/aggravated kidnapping/desecration into aggravated murder) | Kidnapping/aggravated kidnapping were prosecuted as the kidnapping aggravator; desecration not used as aggravator | Nielsen argued lesser offenses should merge into aggravated murder and be vacated | Mixed: Kidnapping merged into aggravated kidnapping—State conceded and conviction vacated; aggravated kidnapping also merged into aggravated murder—court reversed and vacated aggravated kidnapping conviction on plain error grounds; desecration convictions affirmed (not statutory aggravators) |
Key Cases Cited
- Lafferty v. State, 175 P.3d 530 (Utah 2007) (actual juror bias, not mere venire exposure, is required to show prejudice from publicity)
- State v. Harris, 289 P.3d 591 (Utah 2012) (plain error standard requires showing error was harmful)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-prong ineffective assistance standard: deficient performance and prejudice)
- State v. Maestas, 299 P.3d 892 (Utah 2012) (standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence—view record in light most favorable to verdict)
- State v. Shaffer, 725 P.2d 1301 (Utah 1986) (predicate felony used as sole aggravator merges with aggravated murder)
- State v. Ross, 174 P.3d 628 (Utah 2007) (underlying felony that constitutes the aggravating circumstance merges with aggravated murder)
- United States v. Langford, 647 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2011) (circumstantial evidence can establish crime elements; same sufficiency standard applies)
