State v. Newman
2017 Ohio 4047
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Law enforcement made multiple controlled buys in early 2015 and obtained a search warrant for a Fairground Road residence (signed April 16, 2015). The warrant form was headed “Cambridge Municipal Court” though signed by the Guernsey County probate/juvenile judge.
- Newman was indicted on multiple charges including trafficking and possession of cocaine and related offenses; some drug-possession counts later dismissed.
- Newman moved to suppress evidence, arguing the probate/juvenile judge lacked authority to issue the warrant (and the municipal-court caption was fatal); the trial court denied the motion.
- A jury convicted Newman on most counts; he was sentenced to 16 years. Newman appealed raising two issues: (1) use of gross weight (including fillers) for enhanced-degree cocaine offenses; (2) invalidity of the search warrant due to issuing judge’s authority and incorrect caption.
- The court affirmed: it applied Ohio Supreme Court precedent holding total weight (including fillers) governs cocaine thresholds, and it upheld admission of the search-warrant evidence (finding probate/juvenile judge authority not barred under the circumstances and no prejudice from the caption error; alternatively, Leon good-faith protection was available).
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether statutory thresholds for enhanced-degree cocaine offenses are based on gross weight (including fillers) or pure cocaine weight | State: total/gross weight (including fillers) determines offense level | Newman: weight must exclude fillers; only pure cocaine counts toward threshold | Held: gross weight including fillers controls (following Ohio Supreme Court reconsideration) |
| Whether the search warrant was invalid because it was issued by a probate/juvenile judge and captioned as Cambridge Municipal Court, requiring suppression of evidence | State: warrant valid; caption was clerical error and no prejudice; probate/juvenile judge authority to issue warrant supported and good-faith Leon protection applies | Newman: probate judge lacked authority to issue criminal search warrant and wrong caption invalidates warrant | Held: warrant evidence admissible — probate/juvenile judge’s issuance not precluded here; caption error was clerical and not prejudicial; Leon good-faith alternative applies |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (U.S. 1984) (establishes good-faith exception to exclusionary rule)
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (U.S. 1983) (probable cause assessed by totality of circumstances)
- Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (U.S. 1996) (reasonable-suspicion/probable-cause review is de novo on appeal)
- State v. Brown, 142 Ohio St.3d 92 (Ohio 2015) (addressed probate judge authority to issue search warrants)
- State v. George, 45 Ohio St.3d 325 (Ohio 1989) (trial judge/magistrate must make common-sense probable-cause determination when issuing warrants)
